Abstract:We read with interest the article by Ye and colleagues [1Ye B. Cheng M. Li W. et al.Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in clinical stage Ia lung adenocarcinoma.Ann Thorac Surg. 2014; 98: 217-223Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (74) Google Scholar] about the predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma, in which they reported a 10.6% overall rate of lymph node metastasis.Theoretically, candidates for sublobar resection should be node negative; thus, it is important to improve the accuracy of clinical staging for cancer. According to the data of Ye and colleagues, factors such as ground-glass opacity status, serum carcinoembryonic antigen level, histologic subtype, and maximum standardized uptake value have potential for the prediction of lymph node metastasis. A prediction model based on some of these factors has been established to assess the possibility of lymph node metastasis in early-stage lung cancer [2Zhang Y. Sun Y. Xiang J. Hu H. Chen H. A prediction model for n2 disease in T1 non-small cell lung cancer.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012; 144: 1360-1364Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (56) Google Scholar]. Some issues are worth noting here. First, the specific histology subtype (eg, acinar predominant, micropapillary predominant) was a reliable predictive factor both in the study of Ye and colleagues and in other research [3Zhang Y. Sun Y. Shen L. et al.Predictive factors of lymph node status in small peripheral non-small cell lung cancers: tumor histology is more reliable.Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 20: 1949-1954Crossref PubMed Scopus (47) Google Scholar]. However, for the majority of lung cancer patients, the histology subtype is a postoperative pathologic diagnosis that is difficult to determine before operation because of the lack of a sufficient tumor specimen, so the histology subtype is of limited value for excluding node-positive patients preoperatively. Second, according to their univariate analyses, the node metastasis rates for patients with individual risk factors were less than 20%, suggesting that these predictive factors are insufficiently efficient for excluding node-positive patients.Two approaches have potential value in selecting candidates for sublobar resection. One is to identify high-risk patients for lymph node metastasis, followed by mediastinal staging evaluation. The other is the use of lymphatic tracers for sentinel lymph node mapping. A clinical study has demonstrated that an indocyanine green fluorescence imaging system is feasible for use in sentinel node biopsy and has a high overall accuracy rate of 80.7% [4Yamashita S. Tokuishi K. Anami K. et al.Video-assisted thoracoscopic indocyanine green fluorescence imaging system shows sentinel lymph nodes in non-small-cell lung cancer.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011; 141: 141-144Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (69) Google Scholar]. Optimization of the imaging system and lymphatic tracers for the sentinel lymph nodes would provide an accurate means of determining the optimal candidates for sublobar resection. We eagerly await the further development and refinement of this technology.Again, we congratulate Ye and colleagues on this brilliant study. We are confident that this study will optimize the selection of candidates for either invasive mediastinal staging or sublobar resection. We read with interest the article by Ye and colleagues [1Ye B. Cheng M. Li W. et al.Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in clinical stage Ia lung adenocarcinoma.Ann Thorac Surg. 2014; 98: 217-223Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (74) Google Scholar] about the predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma, in which they reported a 10.6% overall rate of lymph node metastasis. Theoretically, candidates for sublobar resection should be node negative; thus, it is important to improve the accuracy of clinical staging for cancer. According to the data of Ye and colleagues, factors such as ground-glass opacity status, serum carcinoembryonic antigen level, histologic subtype, and maximum standardized uptake value have potential for the prediction of lymph node metastasis. A prediction model based on some of these factors has been established to assess the possibility of lymph node metastasis in early-stage lung cancer [2Zhang Y. Sun Y. Xiang J. Hu H. Chen H. A prediction model for n2 disease in T1 non-small cell lung cancer.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012; 144: 1360-1364Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (56) Google Scholar]. Some issues are worth noting here. First, the specific histology subtype (eg, acinar predominant, micropapillary predominant) was a reliable predictive factor both in the study of Ye and colleagues and in other research [3Zhang Y. Sun Y. Shen L. et al.Predictive factors of lymph node status in small peripheral non-small cell lung cancers: tumor histology is more reliable.Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 20: 1949-1954Crossref PubMed Scopus (47) Google Scholar]. However, for the majority of lung cancer patients, the histology subtype is a postoperative pathologic diagnosis that is difficult to determine before operation because of the lack of a sufficient tumor specimen, so the histology subtype is of limited value for excluding node-positive patients preoperatively. Second, according to their univariate analyses, the node metastasis rates for patients with individual risk factors were less than 20%, suggesting that these predictive factors are insufficiently efficient for excluding node-positive patients. Two approaches have potential value in selecting candidates for sublobar resection. One is to identify high-risk patients for lymph node metastasis, followed by mediastinal staging evaluation. The other is the use of lymphatic tracers for sentinel lymph node mapping. A clinical study has demonstrated that an indocyanine green fluorescence imaging system is feasible for use in sentinel node biopsy and has a high overall accuracy rate of 80.7% [4Yamashita S. Tokuishi K. Anami K. et al.Video-assisted thoracoscopic indocyanine green fluorescence imaging system shows sentinel lymph nodes in non-small-cell lung cancer.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011; 141: 141-144Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (69) Google Scholar]. Optimization of the imaging system and lymphatic tracers for the sentinel lymph nodes would provide an accurate means of determining the optimal candidates for sublobar resection. We eagerly await the further development and refinement of this technology. Again, we congratulate Ye and colleagues on this brilliant study. We are confident that this study will optimize the selection of candidates for either invasive mediastinal staging or sublobar resection. Predictive Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis in Clinical Stage IA Lung AdenocarcinomaThe Annals of Thoracic SurgeryVol. 98Issue 1PreviewSystematic lymph node dissection or sampling in all patients with clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma is currently controversial because the risk of lymph node metastasis is unclear. This study aimed to determine the predictive factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma. Full-Text PDF

Abstract:The authors reported no conflicts of interest.The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest. The authors reported no conflicts of interest. The Journal policy requires editors and reviewers to disclose conflicts of interest and to decline handling or reviewing manuscripts for which they may have a conflict of interest. The editors and reviewers of this article have no conflicts of interest. In 1995, a study conducted by North American Lung Cancer Study Group compared sublobar resection and lobectomy for patients with T1N0 non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and its results consolidated the status of standard lobectomy.1Ginsberg R.J. Rubinstein L.V. Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non–small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study Group.Ann Thorac Surg. 1995; 60: 615-623Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (2434) Google Scholar In recent years, sublobar resection for the treatment of early-stage NSCLC has aroused widespread and ongoing controversy and discussion. In the JCOG0201 study, tumor size ≤3 cm and consolidation tumor ratio (CTR) ≤0.5 showed an excellent prognosis and potentially suitable for sublobar resection.2Ito H. Suzuki K. Mizutani T. Aokage K. Wakabayashi M. Fukuda H. et al.Long-term survival outcome after lobectomy in patients with clinical T1 N0 lung cancer.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. January 11, 2020; ([Epub ahead of print])Google Scholar Based on this result, several clinical trials, including JCOG0802, JCOG0804, and JCOG1211, were designed to explore the potential benefited population for sublobar resection.3Nakagawa K. Watanabe S.I. Kunitoh H. Asamura H. The Lung Cancer Surgical Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group: past activities, current status and future direction.Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017; 47: 194-199Crossref PubMed Scopus (19) Google Scholar At the 101st American Association for Thoracic Surgery annual meeting in 2021, Nakagawa and colleagues3Nakagawa K. Watanabe S.I. Kunitoh H. Asamura H. The Lung Cancer Surgical Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group: past activities, current status and future direction.Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2017; 47: 194-199Crossref PubMed Scopus (19) Google Scholar reported the incredible result of JCOG0802. This phase 3 trial enrolled the patients with invasive peripheral NSCLC (maximum tumor diameter ≤2 cm and CTR >0.5) who were randomly assigned to lobectomy or segmentectomy. The 5-year overall survival was 94.3% for segmentectomy and 91.1% for lobectomy. However, several issues remain unclear. First of all, why did the segmentectomy group have greater local recurrence proportion (10.5% vs 5.4%) but better prognosis? It must be noted that 52 (63%) of 83 patients in the lobectomy group died of other cancer including second lung cancer, or non-neoplastic diseases compared with 27 (47%) of 58 patients in segmentectomy arm. Therefore, does the advantage of prognosis in segmentectomy come from the benefit of other cancer or nontumor factors? The lung cancer–specific survival should be considered as one of the evaluation indicators. Under the premise of similar baseline clinicopathologic characteristics, the segmentectomy arm had better protection of respiratory function than lobectomy (decreased forced expiratory volume in 1 second, 6 months: 10.4% vs 13.1%, 1 year: 8.5% vs 12.0%, P < .001, respectively), which may be reflected in reduced death from non-neoplastic diseases. In particular, the study included 38% (422) of patients ≥70 years, and the protection of lung function was probably particularly important. Further analysis of the prognostic differences between the 2 groups at different ages is necessary. Is lobectomy more suitable for younger patients whereas segmentectomy more suitable for older patients? Can we speculate that in early lung cancer, the benefit of lobectomy is mainly reflected in tumor recurrence, whereas the benefit of segmentectomy is manifested in nontumor diseases? What's more, considering some of patients received adjuvant therapy, it should be disclosed that the genetic mutations situations of patients with or without local recurrence and whether they received other treatments, for example, second surgery, targeted therapy, radiotherapy, etc. Second, 553 (50%) patients had the nodules with CTR = 1.0. It was generally believed that solid components were a factor of poor prognosis4Hattori A. Suzuki K. Takamochi K. Wakabayashi M. Aokage K. Saji H. et al.Prognostic impact of a ground-glass opacity component in clinical stage IA non–small cell lung cancer.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021; 161: 1469-1480Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (68) Google Scholar and lobectomy was the optimal option for the solid nodules. In the JCOG 0201 study, patients with tumor size ≤2 cm and CTR >0.5 undergone lobectomy showed 84.1% 10-year overall survival.2Ito H. Suzuki K. Mizutani T. Aokage K. Wakabayashi M. Fukuda H. et al.Long-term survival outcome after lobectomy in patients with clinical T1 N0 lung cancer.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. January 11, 2020; ([Epub ahead of print])Google Scholar The median follow-up was 7.3 years in JCOG 0802. It is not clear whether the survival advantage of segmentectomy will persist if follow-up time is extended to 10 years or longer. Last but not least, JCOG0802 does not demonstrate the specific pathologic types and subtypes of 2 arms. Considering that 88% (968) of them were lung adenocarcinoma, it remains unknown whether segmentectomy can be applied to nonadenocarcinoma NSCLC, or whether segmentectomy can maintain a survival advantage for solid, papillary, or micropapillary-subtyped lung adenocarcinoma. Besides, since visceral pleural invasion, vascular invasion,5Tsutani Y. Suzuki K. Koike T. Wakabayashi M. Mizutani T. Aokage K. et al.High-risk factors for recurrence of stage I lung adenocarcinoma: follow-up data from JCOG0201.Ann Thorac Surg. 2019; 108: 1484-1490Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (24) Google Scholar tumor spread through air space,6Lu S. Tan K.S. Kadota K. Eguchi T. Bains S. Rekhtman N. et al.Spread through air spaces (STAS) is an independent predictor of recurrence and lung cancer-specific death in squamous cell carcinoma.J Thorac Oncol. 2017; 12: 223-234Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (122) Google Scholar and margin are the high-risk factors for recurrence of stage I lung adenocarcinoma, people need the information in JCOG0802 about pathologic features, resection margins, and margin/tumor size rate. The survival analysis of specific lung segments, the numbers and stations of lymph nodes, and proportion of metastasized lymph nodes also should be disclosed. Before we change the long-term standard treatment strategy for T1N0 NSCLC, further analysis is necessary to identify the best potential benefited population for segmentectomy. We thank Dr Zi-Hao Chen for his help.

Sublobectomy and lymph node sampling are adequate for patients with invasive lung adenocarcinoma presenting as pure ground glass nodules

Pure ground-glass opacities (GGO) lung adenocarcinoma: surgical resection is curative

Prognostic Effect of Ground-Glass Opacity in Subcentimeter Invasive Lung Adenocarcinoma

Comprehensive Study of Surgical Treated Lung Adenocarcinoma with Ground Glass Nodule Component.

Therapeutic strategy for lung adenocarcinoma with pure ground-glass opacity: surgery, radiotherapy, or watchful waiting?

Evaluating the necessity of lymph node sampling in lung adenocarcinoma with ground glass opacities

Segmentectomy for NSCLC: a Better Alternative?

Omitting lymph node dissection for small ground glass opacity-dominant tumors

Effectiveness and Safety of Systematic and Selective Lymphadenectomies in Chinese Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Received Sublobar Resection.

Surgical Outcomes of Lobectomy Versus Limited Resection for Clinical Stage I Ground-Glass Opacity Lung Adenocarcinoma 2 Centimeters or Smaller

Ten-Year Follow-up Results of Pure Ground-Glass Opacity–Featured Lung Adenocarcinomas after Surgery

Optimal Lung Cancer Candidates for Sublobar Resection: Prediction of Pathologic Node-Negative Clinical Stage IA NSCLC.

Real-World Survival Outcomes Based on EGFR Mutation Status in Chinese Patients With Lung Adenocarcinoma After Complete Resection: Results From the ICAN Study

Prognostic Impact of Lymphadenectomy on Outcomes of Sublobar Resection for Stage IA Non–small Cell Lung Cancer ≤2 Cm

Is It Really Necessary to Perform Mediastinal Lymphadenectomy in Surgery for Ground Glass Opacity-Featured Lung Adenocarcinoma?

Risk Factors of Recurrence in Patients with Clinical Stage IA Adenocarcinoma Presented As Ground-Glass Nodule

Sublobar Resections for Small-Sized Stage Ia Lung Adenocarcinoma: a Sino-Japanese Multicenter Study

Subsolid Lung Adenocarcinomas: Radiological, Clinical and Pathological Features and Outcomes.

Sublobar Resection for Lung Adenocarcinoma Less Than 2 Cm Containing Solid or Micropapillary Components Radiologically Presented As Consolidation-to-tumor Ratio (CTR) ≤0.25 [Ground-Glass Opacity (GGO)]

Predictors of Pathologic Tumor Invasion and Prognosis for Ground Glass Opacity Featured Lung Adenocarcinoma

Potential Benefited Population for Sublobar Resection