Abstract:One‐dimensional site response analysis (1D SRA) remains the standard practice in considering the effect of local soil deposits and predicting site‐specific ground motions, although its range of applicability to realistic seismic wavefields is still in question. In this 1D approach, horizontal and vertical ground shaking are assumed to be induced by vertically propagating shear and compressional waves, respectively. A recent study based on analytical two‐dimensional (2D) plane waves and simple point source earthquake simulations has shown two mechanistic limitations in this 1D modelling technique for general inclined seismic waves, that is, systematic over‐prediction of the vertical motion and wave trapping in the 1D soil column. In this article, we evaluate in detail the applicability of this 1D modelling approach to realistic three‐dimensional (3D) simulated seismic wavefields in shallow sedimentary basins. Linear‐viscoelastic 1D SRA predictions using two types of input motions that are commonly used in practice—rock outcrop and in‐column motions, are compared with the reference true site response results from 3D earthquake simulations in terms of various measures in the frequency and time domain. It is shown that the horizontal motion in the 3D seismic wavefield exhibits dominant shear wave propagation phenomenon, while the vertical motion is a combined effect of compressional and shear waves and can be over‐predicted by the 1D approach when the incident seismic waves are inclined. Direct evidence of the wave refraction process that leads to the vertical motion over‐prediction is provided. 1D SRA with in‐column inputs can yield motions that have significantly longer duration compared to the true 3D site response solution due to trapped waves, casting in doubt the frequent need for increased soil damping in existing site studies to compensate for wave attenuation due to scattering alone. Sensitivity investigation on the increase of soil profile damping by a multiplier Dmul shows Dmul values compatible with those found in the literature for both horizontal and vertical motions. It is shown that the level of Dmul optimized for a best match of the spectral acceleration is dependent on the characteristic of the input motion and a larger Dmul is typically required for the vertical component. In contrast, 1D SRA with outcrop motions predicts motions with shorter significant duration due to its inability to capture the basin‐edge generated surface waves. A suite of ground motion simulations was performed to assess the sensitivity of the observations to the basin geologic structure including the velocity gradient, rock‐basin impedance contrast and basin depth. The analysis results show that the accuracy of the simplified 1D procedure is dependent on the wavefield composition of both the input motions and the true 3D site response solution. While the horizontal motions in shallow sedimentary basins can, to the first order, be reasonably captured by the simplified 1D approach, 1D SRA for the vertical component is in general not reliable and contributions from inclined shear waves should be accounted for in site‐specific evaluation of the vertical design ground motion.

Quantification of Site City Interaction Effects on Responses of Buildings and Basin Under Earthquake Loading

Quantitative Analysis of Site-city Interaction Effects on Regional Seismic Damage of Buildings

SCI Effects Under Complex Terrains: Shaking Table Tests and Numerical Simulation

Regional seismic responses of shallow basins incorporating site‐city interaction analyses on high‐rise building clusters

A numerical coupling scheme for nonlinear time history analysis of buildings on a regional scale considering site-city interaction effects

Seismic site–city interaction analysis of super-tall buildings surrounding an underground station: a case study in Hong Kong

Experimental and numerical investigation on seismic response of the soil-structure cluster interaction system

Effects of a Group of High-Rise Structures on Ground Motions under Seismic Excitation

Study on Dynamic Structure-Soil-Structure Interaction of Three Adjacent Tall Buildings Subjected to Seismic Loading

Effect of subterranean levels on the foundation input motions for dynamic response analysis of building structure

Site-City Interaction through Modifications of Site Effects

Applicability of 1D site response analysis to shallow sedimentary basins: A critical evaluation through physics‐based 3D ground motion simulations

Seismic Interaction of Adjacent Structures on Liquefiable Soils: Insight from Centrifuge and Numerical Modeling

Nonlinear study on the structure-soil-structure interaction of seismic response among high-rise buildings

A Physics‐Based Simulation Approach for Urban‐Scale Earthquake Disaster From Fault to City: Theory, Verification, and Application

Beneficial and detrimental impacts of soil-structure interaction on seismic response of high-rise buildings

Effect of Soil Structure Interaction on Seismic Response of Buildings

Seismic Structure‐Soil‐Structure Interaction between inelastic structures

SSI AND SSSI EFFECTS IN SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF TWIN BUILDINGS: DISCRETE MODEL CONCEPT

Seismic analysis of the soil–structure interaction for a high rise building adjacent to deep excavation

The influence of building interactions on seismic and elastic surface waves