Association between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte or platelet-to-lymphocyte and renal tubular injury in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients
易斌,王阳阳,戴雅丽,廖祥玉,彭娟,吴苏
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115791-20200420-00235
2021-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To explore the association between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) or platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR) and renal tubular injury in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients.Methods:A total of 268 patients with T2DM who were hospitalized in the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from September 2018 to September 2019 were assigned to three groups according to their urine albumin/urine creatinine ratio (UACR): normal-albuminuria group (Normal group, UACR<30 mg/g), micro-albuminuria group (Micro group, 30≤UACR<300 mg/g), and macro-albuminuria group (Macro group, UACR≥300 mg/g). Basic information and clinical data of the research objects were collected. Fasting extraction of elbow venous blood to test blood routine, and biochemical indicators such as glycated hemoglobin A 1c and hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). NLR, PLR and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated. After detecting the levels of α1-microglobulin (α1-MG), β2-microglobulin (β2-MG), retinol-binding protein (RBP) and urinary creatinine (Ucr), we regarded α1-MG/Ucr, β2-MG/Ucr and RBP/Ucr as indicators for responding renal tubular injury. Group differences were tested with Chi-square test, analysis of variance and nonparametric tests. Associations between inflammatory index and renal injury markers were performed by Spearman correlation coefficients. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analyses determined the prediction efficiency of model. Results:NLR and PLR levels were increased in the Macral group (94 cases) than both the Micro group(80 cases) and the Normal group(94 cases), and the difference was statistically significant ( P<0.01). Compared with the Micro group, NLR levels in the Macro group were increased in Macro group ( P<0.05). With the increase in NLR and PLR quartiles, there were gradual increase in UACR, urine RBP/Ucr, urine α1-MG and urine β2-MG, and the differences were statistically significant ( P<0.05). Spearman correlation analysis showed that NLR and PLR had positive correletions with UACR, RBP/Ucr, α1-MG/Ucr and β2-MG/Ucr ( r=0.254-0.385, all P<0.01), and a negative correlation with eGFR ( r=-0.328, -0.151, both P<0.01). In addition, ROC curve analyses showed that the AUC and sensitivities of NLR in predicting UACR>30 mg/g, eGFR<60 ml·min －1·(1.73 m 2) －1, RBP/Ucr>0.10, α1-MG/Ucr>2.08, or β2-MG/Ucr>0.07 (AUC were 0.700, 0.679, 0.717, 0.702, 0.737, respectively; sensitivities were 75.29%, 85.87%, 80.88%, 83.74%, 85.59%, respectively) were all higher than those of PLR (AUC were 0.639, 0.639, 0.659, 0.644, 0.676, respectively; sensitivities were 58.05%, 75.00%, 63.24%, 65.04%, 58.56%, respectively) and hs-CRP (AUC were 0.597, 0.559, 0.618, 0.644, 0.653, respectively; sensitivities were 62.50%, 30.12%, 63.93%, 68.42%, 70.87%, respectively). Conclusion:Both NLR and PLR are closely related to renal tubular injury in patients with T2DM, and NLR is superior to PLR or hs-CRP not only in reflecting glomerular damage but also in tubular injury.