Immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge after immune-related adverse events: a retrospective study from VigiBase update in 2024 looking for emergent safety signals

Jean-Matthieu L'Orphelin,Angélique Da Silva,Jean Cabon,Joachim Alexandre,Charles Dolladille
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091708
IF: 3.006
2024-12-05
BMJ Open
Abstract:Objectives Limited information is available on the safety of a rechallenge with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) after occurrence of an immune-related adverse event (irAE). We aim to identify potential emergent safety signals. Design This is an update of our observational pharmacovigilance cohort study. Setting We exanimated individual case safety reports from the WHO database VigiBase. Participants We included all individual case safety reports with ICI and rechallenged ICI. Interventions We identified that incident irAE cases using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities V.26.1 related with at least one ICI administration were systematically collected until 1 March 2024. Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary outcome was the recurrence rate (expressed as a percentage with its 95% CI) of the initial irAE postrechallenge with the same ICI. Results We identified 1016 irAEs cases from ICI rechallenges. Of these, 323 irAEs recurrences occurred (31.8%, 95% CI 28.1 to 34.0). The most common postrechallenge irAEs were nephritis (recurrence rate: 50%, 95% CI 25 to 75), skin irAEs (44%, 95% CI 31 to 58) and colitis (39%, 95% CI 33 to 44). Conclusions In this updated, largest cohort study on rechallenge (NCT04696250), we observed a 31.8% recurrence rate of the same irAE postrechallenge with the same ICI, building on our previous findings. Trial registration number NCT04696250.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?