Effects of Alexithymia on Moral Decision-Making in Sacrificial Dilemmas: High Alexithymia is Associated with Weaker Sensitivity to Moral Norms
Xiyou Chen,Zhihui Wu,Bin Zhan,Daoqun Ding,Xiangyi Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S407744
IF: 3.974
2023-06-28
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Abstract:Xiyou Chen, 1, 2, &ast Zhihui Wu, 1, 2, &ast Bin Zhan, 3 Daoqun Ding, 1, 2 Xiangyi Zhang 1, 4 1 Department of Psychology, School of Education Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, People's Republic of China; 2 Center for Mind and Brain Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, People's Republic of China; 3 State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China; 4 Cognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, People's Republic of China &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Daoqun Ding; Xiangyi Zhang, Department of Psychology, School of Education Science, Hunan Normal University, 36 Lushan Road, Changsha, Hunan, 410081, People's Republic of China, Email ; Purpose: Although several studies have investigated the association between alexithymia and moral decision-making in sacrificial dilemmas, the evidence remains mixed. The current work investigated this association and how alexithymia affects moral choice in such dilemmas. Methods: The current research used a multinomial model (ie, CNI model) to disentangle (a) sensitivity to consequences, (b) sensitivity to moral norms, and (c) general preference for inaction versus action irrespective of consequences and norms in responses to moral dilemmas. Results: Higher levels of alexithymia were associated with a greater preference for utilitarian judgments in sacrificial dilemmas (Study 1). Furthermore, individuals with high alexithymia showed significantly weaker sensitivity to moral norms than did those with low alexithymia, whereas there were no significant differences in sensitivity to consequences or a general preference for inaction versus action (Study 2). Conclusion: The findings suggest that alexithymia affects moral choice in sacrificial dilemmas by blunting emotional reactions to causing harm, rather than through increased deliberative cost–benefit reasoning or general preference for inaction. Keywords: alexithymia, moral decision-making, deontology, utilitarianism, CNI model Alexithymia is a multidimensional personality trait characterized by difficulty in identifying one's own feelings and distinguishing them from bodily sensations, difficulty in verbalizing one's feelings, and an externally oriented thinking style. 1 It is normally distributed in the general population (at nearly 10%), 2 and high levels of alexithymia are commonly associated with more severe psychopathological symptoms. 3 Alexithymia is widely considered an important transdiagnostic risk factor for diverse affective disorders, such as anxiety, 4 depression, 5 psychopathy, 6 and autism spectrum disorder. 7 It has been widely reported that people with alexithymia exhibit impairments in their ability to cognitively process and experience emotions. 8 For instance, people with alexithymia show problems in forming social attachments and motivating themselves to act altruistically to relieve others' distress. 9,10 Individuals with deficits in emotional processing may exhibit poor performance on social cognition tasks because social cognition abilities require people to understand mental states and emotions. 11 Indeed, alexithymia has been found to be linked to impairment in social cognition skills, including the identification of other people's emotional facial expressions, 12 higher-order mentalizing. 13 A mechanistic cognitive model of self-to-other emotional contagion has been proposed to provide a framework for understanding abnormal emotion processing in alexithymia, psychopathy, and autism. This model suggests that the primary impairment in alexithymic individuals may lie within an Affective Representation System, and that this impairment is likely to interfere with affective learning. If the Affective Representation System is impaired, individuals with alexithymia will be unable to shape a consciously accessible representation of their own emotional state, and this lack of a differentiated emotional state in the self provides no chance for the emotional internal state to be linked with perceptual cues to those states in other people (for more details, see Bird and Viding). 14 A substantial body of research in psychology has investigated how individuals resolve moral dilemmas in which aggregate outcomes for the greater good conflict with moral norms. 15</sup -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, clinical, multidisciplinary