Abstract:Objectives: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have emerged as novel treatment options in patients with endometrial cancer. In this study we aimed to compare the survival outcomes of patients with recurrent or advanced endometrial cancer. These patients had received dostarlimab after platinum-based chemotherapy in the single-arm, Phase I GARNET trial. We compared them with a matched indirect real-world cohort. Methods: The real-world cohort was established using National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service data, with five treatment-specific real-world sub-cohorts identified. To compare clinical outcomes between the GARNET trial and real-world cohorts, we performed matching-adjusted indirect comparisons. We used prognostic variables to create matching scenarios, including scenario 1 that incorporated grade, histology, and platinum-based chemotherapy number; scenario 2 that considered histology and platinum-based chemotherapy number; and scenario 3 that included race/ethnicity, stage at diagnosis, histology, and prior surgery. Overall survival was defined as the time between the first dostarlimab dose or second-line real-world treatment and death. Adjusted hazard ratios for matching-adjusted indirect comparisons were estimated via weighted Cox proportional-hazards models. Progression-free survival, using time-to-next treatment as a proxy for real-world cohorts, was summarized descriptively. Results: Distribution of baseline characteristics that were matched was similar between the GARNET cohort (n=153) and the real-world cohort (n=999). The most common International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage in both cohorts was stage III/IV (n=88; 57.5% and n=778; 77.9%, respectively), with endometroid histology predominating in the GARNET cohort (n=121; 79.1%) and non-endometrioid the predominant form in the real-world cohort (n=575; 57.6%). The median overall survival for dostarlimab was longer (range 27.1-40.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.4-non-estimable and 19.4-non-estimable]) both before and after matching for all scenarios compared with the real-world cohort (10.3 months). Across all matching scenarios, patients in the GARNET cohort had a decreased risk of death, with a HR for overall survival of 0.32 (p<0.0001) before matching, as compared with the overall real-world cohort and most treatment-specific real-world cohorts. For all three scenarios, progression-free survival rates at 12 and 18 months were higher for patients on dostarlimab compared with the real-world cohort (0.48 and 0.43 respectively before matching in the GARNET cohort vs 0.28 and 0.16 respectively in the real-world cohort; using time to next treatment as proxy). The effective sample size for scenario 1 was low when compared with the other scenarios (scenario 1: n=18; scenario 2: n=62; scenario 3: n=67). Conclusion: In this adjusted indirect dataset, patients with recurrent/advanced mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability-high endometrial cancer post-platinum-based chemotherapy who received dostarlimab in the GARNET trial had significantly improved overall survival compared with patients receiving current second-line treatment in England.

Dostarlimab: Review on success story and clinical trials

Dostarlimab: A promising new PD-1 inhibitor for cancer immunotherapy

Preclinical characterization of dostarlimab, a therapeutic anti-PD-1 antibody with potent activity to enhance immune function in in vitro cellular assays and in vivo animal models

Dostarlimab in the treatment of mismatch repair deficient recurrent or advanced endometrial cancer

Clinical Activity and Safety of the Anti–Programmed Death 1 Monoclonal Antibody Dostarlimab for Patients With Recurrent or Advanced Mismatch Repair–Deficient Endometrial Cancer

An Integrated Analysis of Dostarlimab Immunogenicity

Dostarlimab for the treatment of advanced endometrial cancer

Patient-reported outcomes in the subpopulation of patients with mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer treated with dostarlimab plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone in the ENGOT-EN6-NSGO/GOG3031/RUBY trial

Population pharmacokinetics and exposure–response of anti‐programmed cell death protein‐1 monoclonal antibody dostarlimab in advanced solid tumours

Population pharmacokinetics and exposure–response relationships of dostarlimab in primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer in part 1 of RUBY

Outcomes of dostarlimab versus chemotherapy in post-platinum patients with recurrent/advanced endometrial cancer: data from the GARNET trial and the National Cancer Registration Service in England

Synergistic Immune-Mediated Anti-tumour Effect of Dostarlimab and Radiotherapy in the Management of MSI-H/dMMR Endometrial Cancer: A Case Report

Curative immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy in patients with mismatch repair-deficient locally advanced rectal cancer: a real-world observational study

Review of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Metastatic dMMR/MSI-H Colorectal Cancer

Durable complete responses to PD-1 blockade alone in mismatch repair deficient locally advanced rectal cancer.

An Indirect Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Dostarlimab and Doxorubicin for the Treatment of Advanced and Recurrent Endometrial Cancer

Secondary Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis Following Dostarlimab Treatment in a Patient With Metastatic Endometrial Cancer

Safety of dostarlimab in combination with chemotherapy in patients with primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer in a phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (ENGOT-EN6-NSGO/GOG-3031/RUBY)

AZUR-2, a phase III, open-label, randomized study of perioperative dostarlimab monotherapy vs standard of care in previously untreated patients with T4N0 or stage III dMMR/MSI-H resectable colon cancer.

Phase II study evaluating the efficacy of niraparib and dostarlimab (TSR-042) in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients.

Real-world dostarlimab use in advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer in France