Abstract:Importance: Chest pain is among the most common reasons for emergency department (ED) presentations. However, most patients are at low risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), with low cardiac adverse outcomes rates. Biomarker testing with troponin levels is key in the initial assessment for ACS. Although serial troponin testing can improve the diagnosis of ACS in clinical practice, some patients deemed to be low risk are discharged after a single negative troponin test result.Objective: To report the clinical outcomes of patients discharged after a single negative troponin test result compared with patients discharged after serial troponin measurements.Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a retrospective cohort study of ED encounters from May 5, 2016, to December 1, 2017, across 15 community EDs within an integrated health care system in southern California. The study cohort includes 27 918 adult ED encounters in which patients were evaluated for suspected ACS with a HEART (history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, and troponin) score and an initial conventional troponin-I measurement below the level of detection (<0.02 ng/mL). Statistical analysis was performed from December 1, 2019, to December 1, 2020.Exposure: Single troponin test vs multiple troponin tests.Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was acute myocardial infarction or cardiac mortality; secondary outcomes included coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous coronary intervention, invasive coronary angiography, and unstable angina within 30 days of discharge. A multivariable logistic regression model was performed to evaluate the association between testing strategies and clinical outcomes.Results: A total of 27 918 patient encounters (16 212 women [58.1%]; mean [SD] age, 58.7 [15.2] years) were included in the study. Of patients with an initial troponin measurement below the level of detection, 14 459 (51.8%) were discharged after a single troponin measurement, and 13 459 (48.2%) underwent serial troponin tests. After adjustment for cardiac risk factors and comorbidities, there was no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome of acute myocardial infarction or cardiac mortality within 30 days between the 2 groups (single troponin, 56 [0.4%] vs serial troponin, 52 [0.4%]; adjusted odds ratio, 1.41 [95% CI, 0.96-2.07]). Patients discharged after a single troponin test had lower rates of coronary artery bypass graft (adjusted odds ratio, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.11-0.48]) and invasive coronary angiography (adjusted odds ratio, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.38-0.56]).Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that patients are routinely discharged from the ED after a single negative troponin test result, and when compared with serial troponin testing, a single troponin test appears safe based on current physician decision-making, with no difference in rates of 30-day cardiac mortality and acute myocardial infarction, which are low in both groups.

Single-Sample Rule-Out of an Acute Coronary Occlusion With High-Sensitivity Troponin

Cardiac Troponin T Reporting, Clinical Outcomes, and Health Care Resource Use

Abstract 13670: Single versus Serial Measurements of Cardiac Troponin in the Evaluation of Emergency Department Patients With Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction

Fastidious adherence to 0/1-hour high-sensitivity troponin T testing reduces emergency department length of stay in patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndromes

Introduction of a high sensitivity troponin reduces ED length of stay

Safety and efficiency of implementation of high-sensitivity troponin T in the assessment of emergency department patients with cardiac chest pain

Improved Utilization of Serial Testing Without Increased Admissions after Implementation of High-Sensitivity Troponin I: a Controlled Retrospective Cohort Study

The use of a point of care high sensitivity troponin in the investigation of patients presenting to the Emergency Department with undifferentiated chest pain

Clinical Impact of Using a More Sensitive Troponin Assay in Patients with Acute Chest Pain.

Single vs Serial Measurements of Cardiac Troponin Level in the Evaluation of Patients in the Emergency Department With Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction

Comparison of multiple high sensitivity cardiac troponin assays for early low risk rule out of myocardial infarction: SCORECARD

Point-of-care high-sensitivity cardiac troponin in suspected acute myocardial infarction assessed at baseline and 2 h

A Single High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Strategy for Ruling Out Myocardial Infarction

Pre-hospital One-Hour Troponin in a Low-Prevalence Population of Acute Coronary Syndrome: OUT-ACS study

A-011 Single High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I Compared to High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Measurement to Rule Out Acute Myocardial Infarction at Low Risk for 30-Day Adverse Events: CONTRAST Study

Sex-specific high-sensitivity troponin T cut-points have similar safety but lower efficacy than overall cut-points in a multisite U.S. cohort

Rapid rule-out of acute myocardial infarction using the 0/1-hour algorithm for cardiac troponins in emergency primary care: the OUT-ACS implementation study

Validity of a Novel Point-of-Care Troponin Assay for Single-Test Rule-Out of Acute Myocardial Infarction

A single high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T compared to the HEART score for a rapid rule-out of acute myocardial infarction at a prehospital emergency clinic

Comparison of rapid test for high-sensitivity troponin I with laboratory high-sensitivity troponin T in patients with acute chest pain - a prospective monocentric study

A-005 Comparison of Performance of High Sensitive Troponin I (cTNIH) by "Point of care" (POC) and Automated cTNIH Immunoassays in Patients at Low Risk of Heart Attack in a Chilean Emergency Unit; Impact on E.R Department Efficiency