Evaluation of Groundwater Potential Zones Using GIS‐Based Machine Learning Ensemble Models in the Gidabo Watershed, Ethiopia

Mussa Muhaba Mussa,Tarun Kumar Lohani,Abunu Atlabachew Eshete
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202400137
IF: 5.135
2024-10-18
Global Challenges
Abstract:This study uses GIS‐based Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) machine learning models to evaluate groundwater potential zones (GWPZs) in the Gidabo watershed utilizing data from 75 boreholes and springs. Water bodies, springs, low‐lying areas, and forests all have good GWPZs, while shrubland and grassland have poor GWPZs. The main objective of this study is to map and evaluate groundwater potential zones (GWPZs) using advanced ensemble machine learning (ML) models, notably Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). GWPZs are identified by considering essential factors such as geology, drainage density, slope, land use/land cover (LULC), rainfall, soil, and lineament density. This is combined with datasets used for training and validating the RF and SVM models, which consisted of 75 potential sites (boreholes and springs), 22 non‐potential sites (bare lands and settlement areas), and 20 potential sites (water bodies). Each dataset is randomly partitioned into two sets: training (70%) and validation (30%). The model's performance is evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC‐ROC). The AUC of the RF model is 0.91, compared to 0.88 for the SVM model. Both models classified GWPZs effectively, but the RF model performed slightly better. The classified GWPZ map shows that high GWPZs are typically located within water bodies, natural springs, low‐lying regions, and forested areas. In contrast, low GWPZs are primarily found in shrubland and grassland areas. This study is vital for decision‐makers as it promotes sustainable groundwater use and ensures water security in the studied area.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?