Abstract:Background: Fetal growth restriction is associated with an increased risk for adverse neonatal outcomes. The Hadlock singleton growth reference is widely used to determine the estimated fetal weight percentile for both twin and singleton gestations. The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development's twin-specific growth reference accounts for the different growth trajectory that twins follow during gestation. There is a lack of research comparing these different growth references in their ability to identify fetal growth restriction that is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes in dichorionic twin gestations. Objective: This study aimed to compare a twin-specific growth reference (the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development's twin-specific growth reference) and a singleton growth reference (Hadlock) in their ability to identify fetal growth restriction associated with adverse neonatal outcomes in dichorionic twin gestations. Study design: This was a retrospective cohort study of dichorionic twin gestations at ≥32 weeks' gestation delivered at a single institution between 2004 and 2019 with the serial growth ultrasounds and neonatal outcomes data available for analysis. Using their last growth ultrasound before delivery, twins were classified into the following 3 categories: fetal growth restriction according to both the Hadlock and Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development references, fetal growth restriction according to the Hadlock reference only, and no fetal growth restriction according to either reference, with fetal growth restriction defined as an estimated fetal weight of <10th percentile for gestational age. Multivariable generalized linear mixed models were used to assess the adverse neonatal outcomes via pair-wise comparisons between the groups, with a random-effects component to account for twin-pair correlations. Results: A total of 1460 dichorionic twin infants were included with 8.1% (n=118) of cases classified as fetal growth restricted by both the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and Hadlock references, 8.8% (n=129) of cases classified as fetal growth restricted by the Hadlock reference only, and 83.1% (n=1213) of cases classified as no fetal growth restriction by either reference. Compared with twins with no fetal growth restriction by either reference, twins with fetal growth restriction by both references were more likely to experience mild (adjusted odds ratio, 2.38; confidence interval, 1.38-4.13) or severe (adjusted odds ratio, 2.82; confidence interval, 1.16-6.88) composite neonatal morbidity. Compared with twins with fetal growth restriction according to the Hadlock reference only, twins with fetal growth restriction according to both references were more likely to experience mild (adjusted odds ratio, 2.03; confidence interval, 1.00-4.14) but not severe (adjusted odds ratio, 3.70; confidence interval, 0.72-18.90) composite neonatal morbidity. Composite neonatal morbidity was not different between twins with fetal growth restriction according to the Hadlock reference only and those with no fetal growth restriction by either growth reference. Conclusion: The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development's twin-specific growth reference better identifies the risk for adverse neonatal outcomes in dichorionic twin gestations diagnosed with fetal growth restriction. The use of the Hadlock singleton growth reference more than doubles the number of dichorionic twins identified with fetal growth restriction who seem to be at a low-risk for neonatal morbidity, leading to unnecessary maternal anxiety, increased antenatal testing, and possibly iatrogenic preterm delivery.

OC20.01: Twin versus singleton growth charts in the diagnosis of small for gestational age in twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta‐analysis

OC20.04: Perinatal outcomes of early Twin–twin transfusion syndrome: an international multicentre study

Predictive Accuracy of Singleton Versus Customized Twin Growth Chart for Adverse Perinatal Outcome: A Cohort Study

OP16.07: Outcomes of twin pregnancies complicated by prelabour rupture of membranes before 26 weeks of gestation: systematic review and meta‐analysis

OP16.08: Perinatal outcomes of monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies complicated by selective fetal growth restriction in a selected tertiary fetal care centre

EP14.09: Comparison of anastomoses and perinatal outcome in selective fetus growth restriction with and without Twin–twin transfusion syndrome

The clinical meaning of the S/D ratio of umbilical artery in forecasting fetal growth of twins

A cohort study of fetal growth in twin pregnancies by chorionicity: comparison with European and American standards

OP16.04: Perinatal outcomes of selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic pregnancies diagnosed with different criteria: ISUOG versus Delphi criteria

EP14.23: Ultrasound screening for preterm birth in twin pregnancies: a prospective longitudinal pilot study

EP14.01: Small‐for‐gestational‐age twins with isolated lagging abdominal circumference in twin gestations

Maternal Utero-Placental Perfusion Discordance in Monochorionic-Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies with Selective Growth Restriction Assessed by Three-Dimensional Power Doppler Ultrasound

Ultrasonographic Features and Pregnancy Outcomes of Complications in Monochorionic Twin Pregnancy During Various Pregnancy Periods

Development of fetal growth charts in twins stratified by chorionicity and mode of conception: a retrospective cohort study in China

Evaluating 2 year outcome in twins < or = 30 weeks gestation at birth: a regional perinatal unit's experience

Dichorionic twin-specific vs singleton growth references for diagnosis of fetal growth restriction

OC02.07: Ultrasound predicted birthweight and identification of growth abnormalities in severely obese women: a national cohort study

EP08.14: Computerised CTG features in small for gestational age and fetal growth restriction between 32+0 and 36+6 weeks

EP14.22: Twin pregnancy outcomes when dating by the larger, smaller or mean Crown–rump length

Retrospective validation of 11–13 weeks’ gestation ultrasound characteristics as predictive tools for twin-twin transfusion syndrome and selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies

EP14.21: Impact of selective fetal growth restriction on survival after fetoscopic laser ablation in Twin–twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS)