Defining and delivering resilient ecological networks: Nature conservation in England

Nick JB Isaac, Peter NM Brotherton, James M Bullock, Richard D Gregory, Katrin Boehning‐Gaese, Ben Connor, Humphrey QP Crick, Robert P Freckleton, Jennifer A Gill, Rosemary S Hails, Minna Hartikainen, Alison J Hester, EJ Milner‐Gulland, Thomas H Oliver, Richard G Pearson, William J Sutherland, Chris D Thomas, Justin MJ Travis, Lindsay A Turnbull, Kathy Willis, Guy Woodward, Georgina M Mace

2018-11-01

Abstract:Planning for nature conservation has increasingly emphasised the concepts of resilience and spatial networks. Although the importance of habitat networks for individual species is clear, their significance for long‐term ecological resilience and multi‐species conservation strategies is less established. Referencing spatial network theory, we describe the conceptual basis for defining and assessing a network of wildlife areas that supports species’ resilience to multiple forms of perturbations and pressures. We explore actions that could enhance network resilience at a range of scales, based on ecological principles, with reference to four well‐established strategies for intervention in a spatial network (“Better, Bigger, More and Joined”) from the influential Making Space for Nature report by Lawton et al. (). Building existing theory into useable and scalable approaches applicable to large numbers of species is …