Abstract:Due to the complexity of software systems, defects are inevitable. Understanding the types of defects could help developers to adopt measures in current and future software releases. In practice, developers often categorize defects into various types. One common categorization is based on fault triggers of defects. Fault trigger is a set of conditions which activate a defect (i.e., Fault) and propagate the defect into a failure. In general, there are two types of defect based fault triggering conditions, Bohrbug and Mandelbug. Bohrbug refers to a bug which can be easily isolated, and its activation and error propagation is simple. Mandelbug refers to a bug whose activation and/or error propagation is complex (e.g., A time lag between the fault activation and the failure occurrence). With these category labels, developers can better perform post-mortem analysis to identify common characteristic of the defects, and design specific fault-tolerance mechanisms. However, in most software systems, these category labels are often unavailable. To address this problem, in this paper, we propose a text mining solution which categorize defects into fault trigger categories by analyzing the natural-language description of bug reports. A previous study shows that Mandelbug is more complex and needs more time to be fixed. Thus, to better identify Mandelbugs, we propose a novel Fuzzy Set based Feature Selection algorithm named USES, which selects the features (i.e., Terms) which have high ability to distinguish Mandelbugs from Bohrbugs. USES first caches a set of terms based on their fuzzy affinity scores to Bohrbug or Mandelbug. Next, it iterates many times, and in each iteration, it selects a subset of terms, and builds a classifier on these terms. USES selects the classifier and the terms which could achieve the best performance on a training data. We evaluate our solution on 4 datasets including Linux, Mysql, Apache HTTPD, and AXIS containing a total of 809 bug reports. We show that USES with naive Bayes multinomial achieves the best performance, it achieves Mandelbug F-measure scores of 0.298 - 0.615. We also compare USES with other baseline approaches. The results show that USES on average improves Mandelbug F-measure scores of the best performing baseline by 12.3%.

Improving high-impact bug report prediction with combination of interactive machine learning and active learning

Automatic, High Accuracy Prediction of Reopened Bugs

Automated Configuration Bug Report Prediction Using Text Mining.

Automated Bug Report Field Reassignment and Refinement Prediction

Automated Identification of High Impact Bug Reports Leveraging Imbalanced Learning Strategies

HYDRA: Massively Compositional Model for Cross-Project Defect Prediction

High-Impact Bug Report Identification with Imbalanced Learning Strategies

Which Packages Would Be Affected by This Bug Report?

Improving Automated Bug Triaging with Specialized Topic Model.

Automatic Defect Categorization Based on Fault Triggering Conditions

Domain knowledge-based security bug reports prediction

A Domain Knowledge-Guided Lightweight Approach for Security Bug Reports Prediction

A New Method of Security Bug Reports Analysis

A Comparative Study of Supervised Learning Algorithms for Re-opened Bug Prediction.

Locality-based Security Bug Report Identification Via Active Learning

Better Security Bug Report Classification via Hyperparameter Optimization

A Comparative Study of Class Rebalancing Methods for Security Bug Report Classification

Bug Severity Prediction Using Question-and-answer Pairs from Stack Overflow

Improving the Security of Wireless Network Through Cross-project Security Issue Prediction

EFSPredictor: Predicting Configuration Bugs with Ensemble Feature Selection.

Blocking Bug Prediction Based on XGBoost with Enhanced Features