P642 Effect of prior vedolizumab treatment on ustekinumab time-on-treatment in Crohn’s disease: a targeted literature review and statistical analyses

G Owen,R Harvey,G Shields,A Jenkins,J Robertson,J Eaton
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0772
2024-01-01
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
Abstract:Abstract Background Ustekinumab, vedolizumab and anti-TNFα therapies are all biologics that are licensed to treat moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease (CD). With many new therapies available in moderate-to-severe CD, the question of the optimal sequence in which to administer biologics becomes more pertinent. In this study, we aimed to determine if ustekinumab treatment effectiveness was affected by prior vedolizumab treatment in patients with CD. Methods We conducted a targeted literature review to identify evidence for ustekinumab effectiveness both with and without prior vedolizumab treatment. The population of interest was patients with moderate-to-severe CD treated with prior anti-TNFα. Studies were required to report single lines of treatment (e.g., specify second-line or state after one anti-TNF). Ustekinumab time-on-treatment (ToT) Kaplan-Meier (KM) data were recreated using digitisation methods and grouped into 2 categories (based on prior vedolizumab exposure) for subsequent statistical analysis. We compared ToT over a 34-month period (maximum follow-up period observed across all studies). A log-rank test was performed to identify whether there was a statistically significant difference in ToT between to the two groups across the follow-up period and Cox regression modelling was used to identify the direction of trends through estimation of a hazard ratio (HR). Results We identified 4 studies (n=495) that reported ustekinumab ToT after 1 anti-TNFα and 2 studies (n=69) that reported ustekinumab ToT after 1 anti-TNFα and vedolizumab. Based on the KM curves pooled across studies, the analysis showed the probability of remaining on treatment for ustekinumab following 1 anti-TNFα and vedolizumab was higher than following just 1 anti-TNFα. The log-rank test demonstrated a statistically significant difference between these two groups (HR=0.523; 95% CI: [0.310, 0.883]; log-rank p-value=0.014). We identified a further 3 studies (n=1,017) that reported ustekinumab ToT after ≥1 anti-TNFα, and a further 2 studies (n=441) that reported ustekinumab ToT after ≥1 anti-TNFα and vedolizumab. Although these studies stated second line treatment of ustekinumab, some patients had received ≥2 prior anti-TNFα, which may have biased ToT results. There was no statistically significant difference in ToT for ustekinumab following ≥1 anti-TNFα and vedolizumab compared to following ≥1 anti-TNFα (HR=1.167; 95% Cl: [0.971, 1.1404]; log-rank p-value=0.098) Conclusion Our research shows that prior vedolizumab treatment does not negatively impact ustekinumab ToT in CD, which may have implications for the sequencing of biologics in moderate-to-severe CD and should be considered when deciding on the most appropriate treatment for patients.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?