Abstract:In numerous classification problems, class distribution is not balanced. For example, positive examples are rare in the fields of disease diagnosis and credit card fraud detection. General machine learning methods are known to be suboptimal for such imbalanced classification. One popular solution is to balance training data by oversampling the underrepresented (or undersampling the overrepresented) classes before applying machine learning algorithms. However, despite its popularity, the effectiveness of sampling has not been rigorously and comprehensively evaluated. This study assessed combinations of seven sampling methods and eight machine learning classifiers (56 varieties in total) using 31 datasets with varying degrees of imbalance. We used the areas under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) and receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) as the performance measures. The AUPRC is known to be more informative for imbalanced classification than the AUROC. We observed that sampling significantly changed the performance of the classifier (paired t-tests P < 0.05) only for few cases (12.2% in AUPRC and 10.0% in AUROC). Surprisingly, sampling was more likely to reduce rather than improve the classification performance. Moreover, the adverse effects of sampling were more pronounced in AUPRC than in AUROC. Among the sampling methods, undersampling performed worse than others. Also, sampling was more effective for improving linear classifiers. Most importantly, we did not need sampling to obtain the optimal classifier for most of the 31 datasets. In addition, we found two interesting examples in which sampling significantly reduced AUPRC while significantly improving AUROC (paired t-tests P < 0.05). In conclusion, the applicability of sampling is limited because it could be ineffective or even harmful. Furthermore, the choice of the performance measure is crucial for decision making. Our results provide valuable insights into the effect and characteristics of sampling for imbalanced classification.

PFSC: Parameter-free sphere classifier for imbalanced data classification

Imbalanced Data Sets Classification Method Based on Over-Sampling Technique

One-Sided Fuzzy SVM Based on Sphere for Imbalanced Data Sets Learning

An oversampling FCM-KSMOTE algorithm for imbalanced data classification

Resampling approach for imbalanced data classification based on class instance density per feature value intervals

An adaptive over-sampling method for imbalanced data based on simultaneous clustering and filtering noisy

Sphere Loss: Learning Discriminative Features for Scene Classification in a Hyperspherical Feature Space

Radial-Based Undersampling for imbalanced data classification

Class Imbalance Problem: A Wrapper-Based Approach using Under-Sampling with Ensemble Learning

A Spectral-Spatial Feature Rotation based Ensemble Method for Imbalanced Hyperspectral Image Classification

A New Classifier for Imbalanced Data Based on a Generalized Density Ratio Model

A fuzzy rough set-based undersampling approach for imbalanced data

Binary classification for imbalanced datasets using twin hyperspheres based on conformal method

PF-SMOTE: A Novel Parameter-Free SMOTE for Imbalanced Datasets

Adaptive Subspace Optimization Ensemble Method for High-Dimensional Imbalanced Data Classification

Imbalanced Data Classification Based on Improved Random-SMOTE and Feature Standard Deviation

A Density-Based Random Forest for Imbalanced Data Classification

Relabeling & raking algorithm for imbalanced classification

Under-sampling class imbalanced datasets by combining clustering analysis and instance selection

Adaptive ensemble of classifiers with regularization for imbalanced data classification

An empirical evaluation of sampling methods for the classification of imbalanced data