Abstract:<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Information disclosure is a top priority for official responses to the 2019 coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19). The information published by the authorities as a response to the crisis has been a cause of great concern to the public; however, there is limited evidence of any systematic analyses of the disclosed epidemic information. This in turn has important implications for risk communication. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This study aimed to describe and compare the officially released content regarding the local epidemic situations and analyze the characteristics of information disclosure through local transmission for both the individual and total population levels in major cities of China. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> The 31 capital cities in mainland China were enrolled in a city-level observational study. Data were retrieved from local municipalities and health commission websites as of March 18, 2020. A checklist was employed as a rapid qualitative assessment tool to analyze the information disclosure performance of each city. Descriptive analyses and data visualizations were produced to present and compare the comparative performances of the cities. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> In total, 29 cities (93.5%) established specific COVID-19 webpages to disclose information. Among them, 12 of the city webpages were added to their corresponding municipal websites. A majority of the cities (21 of 31, 67.7%) published their first cases of infection in a timely manner on the actual day of confirmation. Regarding the information disclosures highlighted on the websites, news updates from local media or press briefings were the most prevalent (28 of 29, 96.6%), followed by epidemic surveillance (25 of 29, 86.2%) and advice for the public (25 of 29, 86.2%). Clarifications of misinformation and frequently asked questions were largely overlooked as only 2 cities provided this valuable information. The median daily update frequency of epidemic surveillance summaries was 1.2 times per day (interquartile range 1.0 to 1.3 times), and the majority of these summaries (18 of 25, 72.0%) also provided detailed information of confirmed cases. The reporting of key indicators in the epidemic surveillance summaries, as well as critical facts included in the confirmed case reports, varied substantially between cities. In general, the best performance in terms of timely reporting and the transparency of information disclosures were observed in the municipalities directly administered by the central government compared to the other cities. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> Timely and effective efforts to disclose information related to the COVID-19 epidemic have been made in major cities of China. Continued improvements to local authority reporting will contribute to more effective public communication and efficient public health research responses. The development of protocols and the standardization of epidemic message templates—as well as the use of uniform operating procedures to provide regular information updates—should be prioritized to ensure a coordinated national response. </sec>

Research on the Public Opinion Guidance Mechanism of Major Public Health Incidents

Public opinion communication mechanism of public health emergencies in Weibo: take the COVID-19 epidemic as an example

Evaluating Public Opinions: Informing Public Health Policy Adaptations in China Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic

Internet public opinion dissemination mechanism of COVID-19: evidence from the Shuanghuanglian event

Using Grounded Theory to Identify Online Public Opinion in China to Improve Risk Management—The Case of COVID-19

Public governance mechanism in the prevention and control of the COVID-19: information, decision-making and execution

Authorized, clear and timely communication of risk to guide public perception and action: lessons of COVID-19 from China

Public View of Public Health Emergencies Based on Artificial Intelligence Data

The Impact of Risk Awareness on Public's Health Protection Intention in Public Health Emergency

Information disclosure during the COVID-19 epidemic in China: A city-level observational study (Preprint)

Public Opinion Spread and Guidance Strategy under COVID-19: A SIS Model Analysis

Precise Control and Integrated Management of Public Health Emergencies

Strategies and Effectiveness of Government Public Opinion Guidance in the Crisis Communication Perspective: The Case of Wuhan City Closure in a Sudden Public Incident

Impact of epidemic prevention policies on public vaccination willingness: empirical research in China

Government Information Dissemination During Public Health Emergencies: An Analysis of China's Experiences

Study on the Experience of Public Health System Construction in China's COVID-19 Prevention

Innovate emergency governance mechanism of urban communities in response to major public health events: A qualitative study from multiple principals in Guangzhou, China

Collaborative Leadership, Collective Action, and Community Governance against Public Health Crises under Uncertainty: A Case Study of the Quanjingwan Community in China

Persuasive Effects of Crisis Communication during Public Health Emergency Outbreaks in China

Tracking Public Opinion in China through Various Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Using Social Media to Mine and Analyze Public Opinion Related to COVID-19 in China