Patient Initiated Note about Goals (PING): Patient-Led Conversations in the Electronic Health Record (RP107)

Jessica Ma,William Ratliff,Beth Soule,David J. Casarett
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.02.459
IF: 5.576
2024-04-19
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management
Abstract:Outcomes 1. Describe the development and implementation of Patient Initiated Note about Goals (PING). 2. Describe patient responses and characteristics to the Patient Initiated Note about Goals (PING). Key Message Goals of care conversations are often initiated and documented by clinicians. Prompts to patients can encourage documentation of patient goals and values. A patient-initiated survey on goals in the electronic health record is feasible and can guide goal-concordant care. Importance While clinicians often initiate and document goals of care conversations, patients can be empowered to share their care preferences with their healthcare team through the electronic health record (EHR). Objective(s) To describe the development, implementation, and responses to the Patient Initiated Note about Goals (PING). Scientific Methods Utilized PING was developed with clinicians and patient stakeholder groups at an academic health system. PING included a brief 3-minute survey on patient goals using multiple-choice and free-text options and was written at a 5th-grade reading level. Categories focused on important goals for patients, such as: "not being a burden on others" and "living as long as possible", and answers included, "not very important", "somewhat important", and "very important". PING was implemented in the Spring of 2022 and a notification was sent to patients at high risk of death, based on high-risk diagnosis codes. We described and examined the differences between responses. Results Across the health system, 678 responded to the PING. Respondents were on average 61.5 (SD 17.2) years old, predominantly female (67.6%), White (70.6%), and Non-Hispanic (92.8%). It was "very important" for respondents to "not be a burden on others" (85.5%) and "take care of myself than depending on others" (84.4%), and "not important at all" to "avoid travel to and from clinic appointments" (40.9%). Respondents who valued "living as long as possible" were less likely to have completed an advance directive (AD) ("very important" with an AD (n=141/376, 38%) vs "somewhat or not \ important" with an AD (n=116/231, 49.7%), missing (n=57), p = 0.002). Conclusion(s) A patient initiated EHR survey on goals is feasible and can inform healthcare teams of important patient values. Impact Patients can engage and share their goals in the EHR. Future studies will compare responses to follow up documented conversations with clinicians and healthcare utilization in relation to patient goals. Keywords Advanced care planning, shared decision making/Communication and prognostication
medicine, general & internal,clinical neurology,health care sciences & services
What problem does this paper attempt to address?