Bioprocess-Inspired Room-Temperature Synthesis of Enamel-like Fluorapatite/Polymer Nanocomposites Controlled by Magnesium Ions

Yidi Li,Hang Ping,Jingjiang Wei,Zhaoyong Zou,Pengchao Zhang,Jingjing Xie,Yuhang Jia,Hao Xie,Weimin Wang,Kun Wang,Zhengyi Fu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c04575
2021-05-21
Abstract:Tooth enamel is composed of arrayed fluorapatite (FAP) or hydroxyapatite nanorods modified with Mg-rich amorphous layers. Although it is known that Mg<sup>2+</sup> plays an important role in the formation of enamel, there is limited research on the regulatory role of Mg<sup>2+</sup> in the synthesis of enamel-like materials. Therefore, we focus on the regulatory behavior of Mg<sup>2+</sup> in the fabrication of biomimetic mineralized enamel-like structural materials. In the present study, we adopt a bioprocess-inspired room-temperature mineralization technique to synthesize a multilayered array of enamel-like columnar FAP/polymer nanocomposites controlled by Mg<sup>2+</sup> (FPN-M). The results reveal that the presence of Mg<sup>2+</sup> induced the compaction of the array and the formation of a unique Mg-rich amorphous-reinforced architecture. Therefore, the FPN-M array exhibits excellent mechanical properties. The hardness (2.42 ± 0.01 GPa) and Young's modulus (81.5 ± 0.6 GPa) of the as-prepared FPN-M array are comparable to those of its biological counterparts; furthermore, the enamel-like FPN-M array is translucent. The hardness and Young's modulus of the synthetic array of FAP/polymer nanocomposites without Mg<sup>2+</sup> control (FPN) are 0.51 ± 0.04 and 43.5 ± 1.6 GPa, respectively. The present study demonstrates a reliable bioprocess-inspired room-temperature fabrication technique for the development of advanced high-performance composite materials.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acsami.1c04575?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.1c04575</a>.SEM and HAADF-STEM-EDS of the base layer (Figure S1); SEM of the base layer obtained at different conditions (Figure S2); cross-sectional SEM images of (FPN-M)<i><sub>n</sub></i> with 1–3 layers (Figure S3); oblique side-section-view SEM image of (FPN-M)<sub>3</sub> (Figure S4); cross-sectional SEM images of (FPN)<i><sub>n</sub></i> with 1–3 layers (Figure S5); effect of different concentrations of added Mg<sup>2+</sup> during overgrowth (Figure S6); HAADF-STEM-EDS mapping and EDS profile of the FPN-M nanorod (Figure S7); XPS spectra of the (FPN-M)<sub>3</sub> array (Figure S8); atomic concentration of the base layer, (FPN-M)<sub>3</sub>, and (FPN)<sub>3</sub> (Table S1); overgrowth at different conditions (Figure S9 and S10); intensity ratios of the (112) and (002) peaks in the time-resolved XRD patterns (Table S2); HAADF-STEM-EDS of a single FAP nanorod (Figure S11); load–displacement curves for (FPN-M)<sub>3</sub> and (FPN)<sub>3</sub> (Figure S12); and TGA data for the synthetic (FPN-M)<sub>3</sub> and (FPN)<sub>3</sub> arrays (Figure S13) (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acsami.1c04575/suppl_file/am1c04575_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
materials science, multidisciplinary,nanoscience & nanotechnology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?