Abstract:Differential privacy (DP), as a rigorous mathematical definition quantifying privacy leakage, has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection. Combined with powerful machine learning (ML) techniques, differentially private machine learning (DPML) is increasingly important. As the most classic DPML algorithm, DP-SGD incurs a significant loss of utility, which hinders DPML's deployment in practice. Many studies have recently proposed improved algorithms based on DP-SGD to mitigate utility loss. However, these studies are isolated and cannot comprehensively measure the performance of improvements proposed in algorithms. More importantly, there is a lack of comprehensive research to compare improvements in these DPML algorithms across utility, defensive capabilities, and generalizability. We fill this gap by performing a holistic measurement of improved DPML algorithms on utility and defense capability against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on image classification tasks. We first present a taxonomy of where improvements are located in the ML life cycle. Based on our taxonomy, we jointly perform an extensive measurement study of the improved DPML algorithms, over twelve algorithms, four model architectures, four datasets, two attacks, and various privacy budget configurations. We also cover state-of-the-art label differential privacy (Label DP) algorithms in the evaluation. According to our empirical results, DP can effectively defend against MIAs, and sensitivity-bounding techniques such as per-sample gradient clipping play an important role in defense. We also explore some improvements that can maintain model utility and defend against MIAs more effectively. Experiments show that Label DP algorithms achieve less utility loss but are fragile to MIAs. ML practitioners may benefit from these evaluations to select appropriate algorithms. To support our evaluation, we implement a modular re-usable software, DPMLBench,(1) which enables sensitive data owners to deploy DPML algorithms and serves as a benchmark tool for researchers and practitioners.

Differential privacy may have a potential optimization effect on some swarm intelligence algorithms besides privacy-preserving

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

DP-EPSO: Differential privacy protection algorithm based on differential evolution and particle swarm optimization

Swarm Differential Privacy for Purpose Driven Data-Information-Knowledge-Wisdom Architecture

Performance-Enhanced Federated Learning with Differential Privacy for Internet of Things

More Than Privacy: Applying Differential Privacy in Key Areas of Artificial Intelligence

DPIS: An Enhanced Mechanism for Differentially Private SGD with Importance Sampling

Bring Your Own Algorithm for Optimal Differentially Private Stochastic Minimax Optimization

Fair Differential Privacy Can Mitigate the Disparate Impact on Model Accuracy

Wasserstein Differential Privacy

Mitigating Disparate Impact on Model Accuracy in Differentially Private Learning.

Privacy at a Price: Exploring its Dual Impact on AI Fairness

Not one but many Tradeoffs: Privacy Vs. Utility in Differentially Private Machine Learning

Differentially Private Deep Learning with Iterative Gradient Descent Optimization

A Stochastic Gradient Descent Algorithm Based on Adaptive Differential Privacy

Data Heterogeneity Differential Privacy: From Theory to Algorithm.

Differentially-Private Deep Learning from an Optimization Perspective.

Differential Privacy-Preserving IoT Data Sharing Through Enhanced PSO

Adaptive differential privacy preserving based on multi‐objective optimization in deep neural networks

DP-HyPO: An Adaptive Private Hyperparameter Optimization Framework

Differentially Private Fine-Tuning of Diffusion Models