Abstract:Construct & background: In order to determine students' level of interprofessional competencies, there is a need for well-considered and thoroughly designed interprofessional assessments. Current literature about interprofessional assessments focuses largely on the development and validation of assessment instruments such as self-assessments or questionnaires to assess students' knowledge or attitudes. Less is known about the design and validity of integral types of assessment in interprofessional education, such as case-based assessments, or performance assessments. The aim of this study is to evaluate the evidence for and threats to the validity of the decisions about students' interprofessional performances based on such integral assessment task. We investigated whether the assessment prototype is a precursor to practice (authenticity) and whether the assessment provides valid information to determine the level of interprofessional competence (scoring). Approach: We used a design-based qualitative research design in which we conducted three group interviews with teachers, students, and interprofessional assessment experts. In semi-structured group interviews, participants evaluated the evidence for and threats to the validity of an interprofessional assessment task, which were analyzed using deductive and inductive content analysis. Findings: Although both evidence for and threats to validity were mentioned, the threats refuting the assessment's validity prevailed. Evidence for the authenticity aspect was that the assessment task, conducting a team meeting, is common in practice. However, its validity was questioned because the assessment task appeared more structured as compared to practice. The most frequently mentioned threat to the scoring aspect was that the process of interprofessional collaboration between the students could not be evaluated sufficiently by means of this assessment task. Conclusions: This study showed that establishing interprofessional assessment validity requires three major balancing acts. The first is the balance between authenticity and complexity. As interprofessional practice and competencies are complex, interprofessional tasks require build-up or guidance toward this complexity and chaotic practice. The second is that between authenticity and scoring, in which optimal authenticity might lead to threats to scoring and vice versa. Simultaneous optimal authenticity and scoring seems impossible, requiring ongoing evaluation and monitoring of interprofessional assessment validity to ensure authentic yet fair assessments for all participating professions. The third balancing act is between team scoring and individual scoring. As interprofessional practice requires collaboration and synthesis of diverse professions, the team process is at the heart of solving interprofessional tasks. However, to stimulate individual accountability, the individual performance should not be neglected.

A needs assessment for enhancing workplace-based assessment: a grounded theory study

Workplace-based assessments-Articulating the playbook

Implementation and faculty perception of outpatient medical student workplace-based assessments

Assessment-Seeking Strategies: Navigating the Decision to Initiate Workplace-Based Assessment

Involving ophthalmology departmental stakeholders in developing workplace-based assessment tools

An Analysis of Workplace-Based Assessments for Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency: Does Type of Clinical Assessor Influence Level of Supervision Ratings?

Trust, power and learning in workplace‐based assessment: The trainee perspective

Linking assessment to real life practice – comparing work based assessments and objective structured clinical examinations using mystery shopping

Workplace-based assessments: what, why, and how to implement?

A phenomenological study of resident and faculty experiences with learner engagement in the normalization of workplace-based assessment

How well do workplace-based assessments support summative entrustment decisions? A multi-institutional generalisability study

From Practice to Proficiency: Evaluation of a Novel Workplace-Based Assessment (WBA) in a Postgraduate Chemical Pathology Residency Program in Pakistan

Next steps for workplace-based assessments of entrustable professional activities

Mobile technologies to support workplace-based assessment for entrustment decisions: Guidelines for programs and educators: AMEE Guide No. 154

Family Medicine Resident Experience Toward Workplace-Based Assessment Form in Improving Clinical Teaching: An Exploratory Qualitative Study

Making assessment a team sport: a qualitative study of facilitated group feedback in internal medicine residency

Measuring the quality of workplace learning environments – a qualitative meta synthesis of employee questionnaires

Development and validation of the Workplace Learning Inventory in Health Sciences Education: a multimethod study

Faculty Perceptions of Frame of Reference Training to Improve Workplace-Based Assessment

"A whole other competence story": exploring faculty perspectives on the process of workplace-based assessment of entrustable professional activities

The Balancing Act of Assessment Validity in Interprofessional Healthcare Education: A Qualitative Evaluation Study