Abstract:Fifteen different types of PM2.5 mass concentration samplers were used by seven different monitoring networks at 47 locations in the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, region from 1999 to 2008. The samplers included Federal Reference Method (FRM) samplers, speciation samplers, tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM) samplers, and others. The different measurement principles used in these designs tended to lead to systematic differences (biases) when measuring the same quantity, and to differences in the typical size of random errors (imprecision) introduced by each type of sampler. Bias can take different forms either as a constant bias or as a non-constant (scale) bias, which depends on the size of the quantity being measured. The objective of the work presented here was to simultaneously calibrate the measurements made by these different samplers to remove relative biases (both constant and non-constant) so that all of the available PM2.5 data could be used interchangeably to develop exposure estimates for a retrospective epidemiology study. In order to accomplish this, we used linked temperature-stratified structural equation models, nonlinear regression models, and nonlinear mixed effects models. Applying these methods we constructed a comprehensive measurement error model that included both systematic error and random error components, and derived calibration equations that can be applied to place all of the PM2.5 mass concentration measurements on the same scale. The FRM sampler was used as the reference scale although the parameter estimates are invariant to this choice. Results showed that: (1) 50 degrees C TEOM samplers tended to show a large downward bias relative to the FRM sampler at low temperatures, and the magnitude of this bias decreased according to a nonlinear (sigmoidal) pattern with increasing temperature, (2) speciation samplers and other integrated samplers generally showed smaller biases relative to the FRM sampler that were not temperature-dependent, and (3) FRM samplers tended to be more precise than non-FRM samplers. These results are consistent with our previous work focusing on just a single monitoring site. Results are also presented here for several types of samplers that were not part of our previous study, including 30 degrees C TEOM, FDMS TEOM, and beta attenuation monitors. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Comparison of the TSI Model 8520 and Grimm Series 1.108 Portable Aerosol Instruments Used to Monitor Particulate Matter in an Iron Foundry

Comparison of the Grimm 1.108 and 1.109 Portable Aerosol Spectrometer to the TSI 3321 Aerodynamic Particle Sizer for Dry Particles

Field Comparison of TSI DustTrak PM Monitor with Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance (TEOM)

Measurement system evaluation for upwind/downwind sampling of fugitive dust emissions

Validation of a Light-Scattering PM2.5 Sensor Monitor Based on the Long-Term Gravimetric Measurements in Field Tests.

Development and field evaluation of an online monitor for near-continuous measurement of iron, manganese, and chromium in coarse airborne particulate matter (PM)

Identification of technical problems affecting performance of DustTrak DRX aerosol monitors

A statistic comparison of multi-element analysis of low atmospheric fine particles (PM2.5) using different spectroscopy techniques

Evaluation of the Alphasense optical particle counter (OPC-N2) and the Grimm portable aerosol spectrometer (PAS-1.108)

Hot Filter/Impinger and Dilution Sampling for Fine Particulate Matter Characterization from Ferrous Metal Casting Processes

Precision and Accuracy of a Direct-Reading Miniaturized Monitor in PM2.5 Exposure Assessment

Research on PM2.5, PM10 and PM > 10 Chemical Source Profiles for Key Working Processes of Iron and Steel Plant in China

Comparison of methods for personal sampling of inhalable and total lead and cadmium-containing aerosols in a primary lead smelter

Calibration of PM2.5 Mass Concentrations Used in the Pittsburgh Aerosol Research and Inhalation Epidemiology Study

Monitoring and Source Apportionment of Trace Elements in PM2.5: Implications for Local Air Quality Management.

Source identification and apportionment of PM2.5 and PM2.5−10 in iron and steel scrap smelting factory environment using PMF, PCFA and UNMIX receptor models

Comparison among filter-based, impactor-based and continuous techniques for measuring atmospheric fine sulfate and nitrate

Monitoring of Particulate Matter Outdoors.

A method for liquid spectrophotometric measurement of total and water-soluble iron and copper in ambient aerosols

Comparison of Four Scanning Mobility Particle Sizers at the Fresno Supersite

A Real-Time Comparison of Four Particulate Matter Size Fractions in the Personal Breathing Zone of Paris Subway Workers: A Six-Week Prospective Study