Abstract:The important task of tracking seismic activity requires both sensitive detection and accurate earthquake location. Approximate earthquake locations can be estimated promptly and automatically; however, accurate locations depend on precise seismic phase picking, which is a laborious and time‐consuming task. We adapted a deep neural network (DNN) phase picker trained on local seismic data to mesoscale hydraulic fracturing experiments. We designed a novel workflow, transfer learning‐aided double‐difference tomography, to overcome the 3 orders of magnitude difference in both spatial and temporal scales between our data and data used to train the original DNN. Only 3,500 seismograms (0.45% of the original DNN data) were needed to retrain the original DNN model successfully. The phase picks obtained with transfer‐learned model are at least as accurate as the analyst's and lead to improved event locations. Moreover, the effort required for picking once the DNN is trained is a small fraction of the analyst's. Seismic sensors are widely used to monitor many energy‐related systems. To monitor these systems effectively, we need to process a very large amount of data, which is very labor intensive. A few deep learning models have been developed to perform these tasks for earthquake‐generated signals. We adopted one of these deep learning models developed for kilometer scale and updated it for signals recorded from a meter‐scale project. This process not only allows us to overcome the significant spatial and temporal scale difference between our data and the data used by the original deep learning model but also significantly reduces the amount of required training data. Our results show that the updated model matches human performance but with a much faster speed. A workflow that combines the deep learning algorithm with existing imaging technologies enables improvements for both monitoring small earthquakes and studying subsurface structure. We successfully applied transfer learning to a neural network for data with orders of difference in spatial and temporal characteristics We created a novel workflow by combining deep learning and double‐difference seismic imaging New workflow provides better seismic catalog and larger amount of phase picks compared to human analysts

Fully reversible neural networks for large-scale 3D seismic horizon tracking

A deep convolutional encoder-decoder neural network in assisting seismic horizon tracking

Multiple Attribute Regression Network for 3-D Seismic Horizon Tracking

Fully invertible hyperbolic neural networks for segmenting large-scale surface and sub-surface data

Does shallow geological knowledge help neural-networks to predict deep units?

Neural Network Based 3D Tracking with a Graphene Transparent Focal Stack Imaging System

3-D Seismic Multihorizon Extraction Based on a Domain Adaptive Deep Neural Network

Deep learning for high-resolution seismic imaging

Encoder-Decoder Architecture for 3D Seismic Inversion

Recursive Training of 2D-3D Convolutional Networks for Neuronal Boundary Detection

Strata Boundary-Constrained Multitask Multihorizon Tracking

InversionNet3D: Efficient and Scalable Learning for 3D Full Waveform Inversion

Strata Boundary-Constrained Multi-Task Multi-Horizon Tracking

Example Forgetting: A Novel Approach to Explain and Interpret Deep Neural Networks in Seismic Interpretation

Accelerating Time-Reversal Imaging with Neural Operators for Real-time Earthquake Locations

Variable seismic waveforms representation: Weak-supervised learning based seismic horizon picking

Using a Deep Neural Network and Transfer Learning to Bridge Scales for Seismic Phase Picking

A Partially Reversible U-Net for Memory-Efficient Volumetric Image Segmentation

Research on Elastic Parameter Inversion Method Based on Seismic Facies-Controlled Deep Learning Network

Physics-informed Neural Networks for 3D Seismic Travel Time Tomography

Seismic Attributes Aided Horizon Interpretation Using an Ensemble Dense Inception Transformer Network