Abstract:Differential privacy (DP), as a rigorous mathematical definition quantifying privacy leakage, has become a well-accepted standard for privacy protection. Combined with powerful machine learning (ML) techniques, differentially private machine learning (DPML) is increasingly important. As the most classic DPML algorithm, DP-SGD incurs a significant loss of utility, which hinders DPML's deployment in practice. Many studies have recently proposed improved algorithms based on DP-SGD to mitigate utility loss. However, these studies are isolated and cannot comprehensively measure the performance of improvements proposed in algorithms. More importantly, there is a lack of comprehensive research to compare improvements in these DPML algorithms across utility, defensive capabilities, and generalizability. We fill this gap by performing a holistic measurement of improved DPML algorithms on utility and defense capability against membership inference attacks (MIAs) on image classification tasks. We first present a taxonomy of where improvements are located in the ML life cycle. Based on our taxonomy, we jointly perform an extensive measurement study of the improved DPML algorithms, over twelve algorithms, four model architectures, four datasets, two attacks, and various privacy budget configurations. We also cover state-of-the-art label differential privacy (Label DP) algorithms in the evaluation. According to our empirical results, DP can effectively defend against MIAs, and sensitivity-bounding techniques such as per-sample gradient clipping play an important role in defense. We also explore some improvements that can maintain model utility and defend against MIAs more effectively. Experiments show that Label DP algorithms achieve less utility loss but are fragile to MIAs. ML practitioners may benefit from these evaluations to select appropriate algorithms. To support our evaluation, we implement a modular re-usable software, DPMLBench,(1) which enables sensitive data owners to deploy DPML algorithms and serves as a benchmark tool for researchers and practitioners.

Helmholtz machine with differential privacy

DPHMM: Customizable Data Release with Differential Privacy Via Hidden Markov Model.

DPMLBench: Holistic Evaluation of Differentially Private Machine Learning

Too Good to be True? Turn Any Model Differentially Private With DP-Weights

MSDP: multi-scheme privacy-preserving deep learning via differential privacy

Differential Privacy for Class-based Data: A Practical Gaussian Mechanism

Wasserstein Differential Privacy

Not one but many Tradeoffs: Privacy Vs. Utility in Differentially Private Machine Learning

Rethinking Improved Privacy-Utility Trade-off with Pre-existing Knowledge for DP Training

Heterogeneous Gaussian Mechanism: Preserving Differential Privacy in Deep Learning with Provable Robustness

Scalable Differential Privacy Mechanisms for Real-Time Machine Learning Applications

Differential Privacy Protection Against Membership Inference Attack on Machine Learning for Genomic Data

Differential Privacy With Variant-Noise For Gaussian Processes Classification

Differential Privacy Under Class Imbalance: Methods and Empirical Insights

Explainable Differential Privacy-Hyperdimensional Computing for Balancing Privacy and Transparency in Additive Manufacturing Monitoring

A Survey on Differential Privacy with Machine Learning and Future Outlook

Optimal Differentially Private Model Training with Public Data

Differentially Private Multimodal Laplacian Dropout (DP-MLD) for EEG Representative Learning

Optimizing error of high-dimensional statistical queries under differential privacy

Differential Privacy-preserving Distributed Machine Learning

How to DP-fy ML: A Practical Guide to Machine Learning with Differential Privacy