Breath-, air- and surface-borne SARS-CoV-2 in hospitals
Lian Zhou,Maosheng Yao,Xiang Zhang,Bicheng Hu,Xinyue Li,Haoxuan Chen,Lu Zhang,Yun Liu,Meng Du,Bochao Sun,Yunyu Jiang,Kai Zhou,Jie Hong,Na Yu,Zhen Ding,Yan Xu,Min Hu,Lidia Morawska,Sergey A Grinshpun,Pratim Biswas,Richard C Flagan,Baoli Zhu,Wenqing Liu,Yuanhang Zhang,Sergey A. Grinshpun,Richard C. Flagan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2020.105693
IF: 4.586
2021-02-01
Journal of Aerosol Science
Abstract:<p>The COVID-19 pandemic has brought an unprecedented crisis to the global health sector. When discharging COVID-19 patients in accordance with throat or nasal swab protocols using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), the potential risk of reintroducing the infection source to humans and the environment must be resolved. Here, 14 patients including 10 COVID-19 subjects were recruited; exhaled breath condensate (EBC), air samples and surface swabs were collected and analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in four hospitals with applied natural ventilation and disinfection practices in Wuhan. Here we discovered that 22.2% of COVID-19 patients (n = 9), who were ready for hospital discharge based on current guidelines, had SARS-CoV-2 in their exhaled breath (∼10<sup>5</sup> RNA copies/m<sup>3</sup>). Although fewer surface swabs (3.1%, n = 318) tested positive, medical equipment such as face shield frequently contacted/used by healthcare workers and the work shift floor were contaminated by SARS-CoV-2 (3–8 viruses/cm<sup>2</sup>). Three of the air samples (n = 44) including those collected using a robot-assisted sampler were detected positive by a digital PCR with a concentration level of 9–219 viruses/m<sup>3</sup>. RT-PCR diagnosis using throat swab specimens had a failure rate of more than 22% in safely discharging COVID-19 patients who were otherwise still exhaling the SARS-CoV-2 by a rate of estimated ∼1400 RNA copies per minute into the air. Direct surface contact might not represent a major transmission route, and lower positive rate of air sample (6.8%) was likely due to natural ventilation (1.6–3.3 m/s) and regular disinfection practices. While there is a critical need for strengthening hospital discharge standards in preventing re-emergence of COVID-19 spread, use of breath sample as a supplement specimen could further guard the hospital discharge to ensure the safety of the public and minimize the pandemic re-emergence risk.</p>
environmental sciences,meteorology & atmospheric sciences,engineering, chemical, mechanical