Abstract:In this work, based on the framework of the Coulomb and proximity potential model (CPPM), we systematically study the cluster radioactivity half-lives of 26 trans-lead nuclei by considering the cluster preformation probability which is found to possess a simple mass dependence on the emitted cluster by R. Blendowske and H. Walliser [Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1930(1988)]. Meanwhile, we investigate 28 different versions of the proximity potential formalisms, which \added{are the most complete known proximity potential formalisms and} have been proposed for the description of proton radioactivity, two-proton radioactivity, decay, heavy-ion radioactivity, quasi-elastic scattering, fusion reactions and other applications. The calculated results show that the modified forms of proximity potential 1977 denoted as Prox.77-12 and the proximity potential 1981 denoted as Prox.81 are the most appropriate proximity potential formalisms for the study of cluster radioactivity as the root-mean-square deviation between experimental data and relevant theoretical results obtained are least and the both values are 0.681. For comparison, a universal decay law (UDL) proposed by Qi extit{et al.} [Phys. Rev. C 80, 044326 (2009)], a unified formula of half-lives for decay and cluster radioactivity proposed by Ni extit{et al.} [Phys. Rev. C 78, 044310 (2008)] and a scaling law (SL) in cluster decay proposed by Horoi extit{et al.} [J. Phys. G 30, 945 (2004)] are also used. In addition, utilizing CPPM with Prox.77-12\added{, Prox.77-1, Prox.77-2} and Prox.81, we predict the half-lives of 51 potential cluster radioactive candidates whose cluster radioactivity is energetically allowed or observed but not yet quantified in NUBASE2020. The predicted results are in the same order of magnitude with those obtained by using the compared semi-empirical and/or empirical formulae. \added{At the same time, the competition between decay and cluster radioactivity of these predicted nuclei is discussed and it is found that decay predominates by comparing half-lives}

Exploring the competition between α -decay and proton radioactivity: A comparative study of proximity potential formalisms

Exploring the competition between $α$-decay and proton radioactivity: A comparative study of proximity potential formalisms

Competition of proton radioactivity with α- and β+-decays

Systematic study of two proton radioactivity within the effective liquid drop model

Systematic study of cluster radioactivity in trans-lead nuclei within various versions of proximity potential formalisms

Comparative Studies for Different Proximity Potentials Applied to Large Cluster Radioactivity of Nuclei

Calculations on Decay Rates of Various Proton Emissions

Effects of Differences Between Neutron and Proton Density Distributions Onα-Decay Half-Lives

Competition between <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:math> and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:math> decays for heavy deformed neutron-deficient Pa, U, Np, and Pu isotopes

Systematic Calculations Ofαdecay Properties Based on Results from Recent Experiments

Half-lives of Α Decay from Natural Nuclides and from Superheavy Elements

Half-lives of Α -Decaying Nuclei in the Medium-Mass Region Within the Transfer Matrix Method

An empirical formula for the proton radioactivity

Systematic study of two-proton radioactivity half-lives within the two-potential approach with Skyrme-Hartree-Fock

Competition Between Α Decay and Spontaneous Fission for Heavy and Superheavy Nuclei

Half-lives of one-proton emitters using Effective Liquid Drop Model

Improved Calculation of Alpha Decay Half-life by Incorporating Nuclei Deformation Shape and Proximity Potential

An alpha decay study of superheavy nuclei within a Coulomb and proximity potential model including a Q-value dependent surface diffuseness parameter

Α-Decay Half-Lives of Odd-Mass Nuclei with Differences Between Neutron and Proton Distributions

Competition between α and β decays for heavy deformed neutron-deficient Pa, U, Np, and Pu isotopes