Discovery and validation of genes driving drug‐intake and related behavioral traits in mice

Tyler A. Roy,Jason A. Bubier,Price E. Dickson,Troy D. Wilcox,Juliet Ndukum,James W. Clark,Stacey J. Sukoff Rizzo,John C. Crabbe,James M. Denegre,Karen L. Svenson,Robert E. Braun,Vivek Kumar,Stephen A. Murray,Jacqueline K. White,Vivek M. Philip,Elissa J. Chesler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gbb.12875
2024-01-03
Genes Brain & Behavior
Abstract:We present major results from a tremendously broad screen of drug‐naïve behavioral traits in mice from the knockout Mouse Project, resulting in the identification of multiple null alleles predicted to cause abnormal drug and alcohol intake. We validated these predictions using oral drug self‐administration. In this study, we show that abnormal drug and alcohol intake phenotypes have nonlinear but significant complex associations with underlying behavioral traits such that extreme effects on various traits can lead to similar outcomes on the same drug intake trait and different outcomes on others. Substance use disorders are heritable disorders characterized by compulsive drug use, the biological mechanisms for which remain largely unknown. Genetic correlations reveal that predisposing drug‐naïve phenotypes, including anxiety, depression, novelty preference and sensation seeking, are predictive of drug‐use phenotypes, thereby implicating shared genetic mechanisms. High‐throughput behavioral screening in knockout (KO) mice allows efficient discovery of the function of genes. We used this strategy in two rounds of candidate prioritization in which we identified 33 drug‐use candidate genes based upon predisposing drug‐naïve phenotypes and ultimately validated the perturbation of 22 genes as causal drivers of substance intake. We selected 19/221 KO strains (8.5%) that had a difference from control on at least one drug‐naïve predictive behavioral phenotype and determined that 15/19 (~80%) affected the consumption or preference for alcohol, methamphetamine or both. No mutant exhibited a difference in nicotine consumption or preference which was possibly confounded with saccharin. In the second round of prioritization, we employed a multivariate approach to identify outliers and performed validation using methamphetamine two‐bottle choice and ethanol drinking‐in‐the‐dark protocols. We identified 15/401 KO strains (3.7%, which included one gene from the first cohort) that differed most from controls for the predisposing phenotypes. 8 of 15 gene deletions (53%) affected intake or preference for alcohol, methamphetamine or both. Using multivariate and bioinformatic analyses, we observed multiple relations between predisposing behaviors and drug intake, revealing many distinct biobehavioral processes underlying these relationships. The set of mouse models identified in this study can be used to characterize these addiction‐related processes further.
behavioral sciences,neurosciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?