Abstract:Background: Most obstetric emergencies are initially managed in the emergency department (ED). The Supreme Court decision of Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, overturning Roe v. Wade, in June 2022, eliminated constitutional protection of abortion rights, allowing states to swiftly enact laws that can greatly change reproductive medicine. In this post-Roe landscape, the ambiguity and uncertainty being imposed on clinicians regarding the legality of certain interventions may have catastrophic effects. To understand and plan for the changes that will come and attempt to mitigate adverse outcomes, the authors first assessed the current state of pregnancy-related complication care in the ED setting. This study utilized data obtained from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) to evaluate trends in pregnancy-related ED visits from 2016 to 2020 that could be impacted by restricted abortion access and trigger laws. The authors subsequently analyzed the legislative changes and translated the pertinent ones to dispel misunderstandings and provide a framework for appropriate medical practice. Methods: The retrospective study utilized data from the NHAMCS database from 2016 to 2020, encompassing an estimated total of 4,556,778 pregnancy-related ED visits. NHAMCS is a multi-stage probabilistic sample collected by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) using an annual survey of EDs in the United States. All data were summarized using descriptive statistics such as proportions and 95% confidence intervals Furthermore, the supreme court decision was analyzed in addition to multiple state laws and legal texts. The findings were summarized and discussed. Results: The majority (79.4%) of all studied visits were for patients between the ages of 18-34 years, capturing those in peak reproductive years. This age group also comprised of the bulk (76.4%) of visits for pathologic pregnancies, including ectopic and molar pregnancies, and 79.8% of visits for a spontaneous miscarriage or threatened miscarriage in early pregnancy. Black patients accounted for 25.7%, white patients 70.1%. Regarding ethnicity, patients were separated into Hispanic and non-Hispanic, with Hispanic patients comprising 27% of all ED visits for included diagnoses between 2016 and 2020. Most visits for complications following an induced abortion occurred in the south (70.8%) and were nearly twice as likely to occur in non-metropolitan areas. Approximately 18% patients presenting with a pathologic pregnancy required admission to the hospital and approximately 50% of those visits for pathologic pregnancies and visits for bleeding in pregnancy had a procedure in the ED (49.8% and 49.5%). There were 111,264 estimated visits in which methotrexate was administered, amounting to approximately 1 in 7 visits for ectopic or molar pregnancy. In this data set, approximately 14,000 miscarriage and early bleeding patients received misoprostol. Conclusion: Pregnancy-related ED visits comprise of a significant proportion of emergency care. As it relates to many of the trends previously elucidated on, the true extent of the burden cannot be predicted. It must be emphasized that contrary to popular belief, Dobbs v. Jackson does not prohibit termination of pregnancy in the setting of life-threatening conditions to the mother, including ectopic pregnancy, preeclampsia, and others, but the resultant uncertainty and ambiguity surrounding the constitutional change is leading to an over-compliance of the law, necessarily obstructing reproductive health care. The authors recommend that physicians be mindful of the rapidly-evolving laws in their particular state, and to also practice in accordance with Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA). Patient safety must be prioritized.

Emergency Care Use During Pregnancy and Severe Maternal Morbidity

Identifying urban built environment factors in pregnancy care and maternal mental health outcomes

Postpartum Emergency Care Visits Among North Carolina Medicaid Beneficiaries, 2013-2019

Severe Maternal Morbidity and Maternal Mental Health Hospitalizations or ED Visits

Maternal Risk Conditions and Outcomes by Levels of Maternal Care

Clep_a_243414 405..414

Postpartum Emergency Department Use Following Midwifery-Model vs Obstetrics-Model Care

Trends and inequities in severe maternal morbidity in Massachusetts: A closer look at the last two decades

Severe Maternal Morbidity Disparities Before and During the COVID Pandemic in a Medicaid Population

Measuring the impact of maternal critical care admission on short- and longer-term maternal and birth outcomes

A national analysis of ED presentations for early pregnancy and complications: Implications for post-Roe America

Severe Maternal Morbidity Associated with Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy in the United States

Maternal care utilization and provision during the COVID-19 pandemic: Voices from minoritized pregnant and postpartum women and maternal care providers in Deep South

Social determinants of health and disparities in prenatal care utilization during the Great Recession period 2005-2010

Navigating severe maternal morbidity using big data: Green, yellow, and red flags for researchers

Temporal Variations in Incidence andOutcomes of Critical Illness Among Pregnant and Postpartum Women inCanada: A Population-Based Observational Study

Use of Telehealth Services for Prenatal Care in Mississippi: Comparison of Pre-COVID-19 Pandemic and Pandemic Obstetric Management

Factors associated with maternal morbidity among Black women in the United States

Emergency Department Utilization for Postpartum Behavioral Health Problems and Assault Injury During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Ranked severe maternal morbidity index for population-level surveillance at delivery hospitalization based on hospital discharge data

Hospital Readmission Following Delivery With and Without Severe Maternal Morbidity