Airborne brominated, chlorinated and organophosphate ester flame retardants inside the buildings of the Indian state of Bihar: Exploration of source and human exposure
Ishwar Chandra Yadav,Ningombam Linthoingambi Devi,Amrendra Kumar,Jun Li,Gan Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110212
2020-03-15
Abstract:Since many household products used by individuals contain flame retardants (FRs), there is more chance that these chemicals may be present in the various exhibit of the indoor environment. Despite being one of the fastest-growing economies worldwide, the contamination level, sources, products, and pathways of FRs in India, is either not known or limited. This inspired us to investigate the level, profile, spatial distribution, and sources of different classes of FRs in the indoor air. For this purpose, 15 brominated, 2 chlorinated, and 8 organophosphate FRs (OPFRs) were investigated in indoor air samples from urban and suburban sites of an Indian state of Bihar. Additionally, inhalation health risk exposure to children and the adult was estimated to predict the risk of these chemicals. Overall, ∑8OPFRs (median 351 pg/m3) was the most prominent in air, followed by novel brominated FR (∑6NBFRs) (median 278 pg/m3), polybrominated diphenyl ether (∑9PBDE) (median 5.05 pg/m3), and dechlorane plus (∑2DPs) (median 2.52 pg/m3), and accounted for 55%, 44%, 0.8% and 0.4% of ∑FRs, respectively. Generally, ∑9PBDEs (median 6.29 pg/m3) and ∑8OPFRs (median 355 pg/m3) were measured high at sub-urban sites, while urban sites had the highest level of ∑2DPs (median 2.81 pg/m3) and ∑6NBFRs (median 740 pg/m3). BDE-209 was most abundant among ∑9PBDEs, while syn-DP dominated in ∑2DPs. Likewise, DBDPE was most prevalent in ∑6NBFRs, while TMPP topped among ∑8OPFRs. The principal component analysis revealed contribution from household items, food packaging and paints, hydraulic fluid, a gasoline additive, and de-bromination of BDE-209 as the primary sources of FRs. The estimated daily inhalation exposure (DIE) indicated a relatively high risk to children than the adult. The DIE of individual FR was several folds lower than their corresponding oral reference dose (RfDs), suggesting minimal risk. However, exposure risk, especially to children, may still need attention because other routes of intake may always be significant in the case of Bihar.