Abstract:Improvement of water management and water use efficiency at field scale is highly important under simultaneous salinity and water stress. The models that can translate the effects of different quantity and quality of water to crop yield, are useful tools for water management and improving water productivity (WP). AquaCrop (v4.0) simulates yield, water requirement, WP, soil water content and salinity under different conditions in the field, including water‐limiting and different quality of irrigation water. This study was carried out as split plot design (factorial form) in Birjand, in the east of Iran, in order to evaluate the AquaCrop model. Treatments consisted of three levels of irrigation water salinity (S1, S2, S3 corresponding to 1.4, 4.5, 9.6 dS m‐1) as the main plot, two wheat varieties (Ghods and Roshan), and four levels of irrigation water amount (I1, I2, I3, I4 corresponding to 125, 100, 75, 50% water requirement) as subplot. The model was nested, calibrated and validated separately for each salinity treatment, and also simultaneously for all three salinity treatments. The overall model accuracy was higher for estimating soil moisture profile, as compared to soil salinity profile. For simulation of soil water content, the average values of RMSE, d, CRM and R2 in both calibration and validation were 11.8%, 0.79, 0.05 and 0.61 respectively, while for simulation of soil salinity they were 24.4%, 0.72, 0.19 and 0.57 respectively. The AquaCrop successfully simulated yield, biomass and WP for two wheat varieties under salinity and water‐limiting treatments with high accuracy. Average values of NRMSE, d, CRM, and R2 for both calibration and validation of simulated grain yield were 7.1%, 0.97, 0.001 and 0.9 respectively, for the Roshan variety, while these measures were 8.2%, 0.98, −0.004 and 0.87 respectively, for the Ghods variety. Crop transpiration coefficient (KcTr), normalized crop water productivity (WP*), reference harvest index (HIO), volumetric water content at field capacity (θFC), soil water content at saturation (θsat), and temperature were the most sensitive parameters. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. L'amélioration de la gestion de l'eau et l'utilisation rationnelle de l'eau à l'échelle de la parcelle sont très importantes dans des contextes simultanés de salinité et de stress hydrique. Les modèles qui peuvent traduire les effets de différentes quantités et qualités d'eau sur le rendement des cultures sont des outils utiles pour la gestion de l'eau et l'amélioration de la productivité de l'eau (WP). AquaCrop (v4.0) simule le rendement, les besoins en eau, WP, les teneurs en eau et et en sels dans différentes conditions de terrain, de qualité et quantité d'eau. L'évaluation du modèle AquaCrop a été réalisée à Birjand, dans l'est de l'Iran, avec un plan d'expérience de type split plot (forme factorielle). Les traitements consistaient en trois niveaux de salinité de l'eau d'irrigation (S1, S2, S3 qui correspondent à 1.4, 4.5, 9.6 dS m‐1) comme entrée principale, deux variétés de blé (Ghods et Roshan), et quatre niveaux de quantité d'eau d'irrigation (I1, I2, I3, I4) correspondant à 125, 100, 75, 50% des besoins en eau). Le modèle a été calibré de manière imbriquée et validé à la fois séparément pour chaque traitement de salinité, et aussi simultanément pour les trois traitements de salinité tous ensemble. La précision globale du modèle est meilleure pour estimer le profil d'humidité du sol que pour estimer le profil de salinité. Pour la simulation de la teneur en eau du sol, les valeurs moyennes de RMSE, d, CRM et R2 dans le calibrage et la validation ont été 11.8%, 0.79, 0.05 et 0.61 respectivement, tandis que pour la simulation de la salinité du sol, elles étaient 24.4%, 0.72, 0.19 et 0.57 respectivement. AquaCrop a simulé avec une grande précision le rendement, la biomasse et WP pour deux variétés de blé et pour les différentes conditions d'alimentation en eau et sels. Les valeurs moyennes des NRMSE, d, CRM, et R2 à la fois pour l'étalonnage et la validation de rendement simulé en grain pour la variété Roshan étaient de 7.1%, 0.97, 0.001 et 0.9 respectivement, et de 8.2%, 0.98, −0.004 et 0.87 respectivement, pour la variété Ghods. Le coefficient cultural de transpiration (KcTr), la productivité normalisée de l'eau (WP*), l'indice de récolte de référence (EIO), la teneur en eau volumique à la capacité de champ (θFC), la teneur en eau du sol à saturation (θsat), et la température étaient les paramètres les plus sensibles. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Assimilating Satellite-Based Biophysical Variables Data into AquaCrop Model for Silage Maize Yield Estimation Using Water Cycle Algorithm

Research on Assimilation of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing Data and AquaCrop Model

AquaCrop—The FAO Crop Model to Simulate Yield Response to Water: III. Parameterization and Testing for Maize

Assimilating Sar And Optical Remote Sensing Data Into Wofost Model For Improving Winter Wheat Yield Estimation

Assimilation of LAI Derived from UAV Multispectral Data into the SAFY Model to Estimate Maize Yield

Assimilating remote sensing data into a crop model improves winter wheat yield estimation based on regional irrigation data

Estimating Maize Yield in the Black Soil Region of Northeast China Using Land Surface Data Assimilation: Integrating a Crop Model and Remote Sensing

An Improved Approach of Winter Wheat Yield Estimation by Jointly Assimilating Remotely Sensed Leaf Area Index and Soil Moisture into the WOFOST Model

The distributed CERES-Maize model with crop parameters determined through data assimilation assists in regional irrigation schedule optimization

Assimilating Soil Moisture Retrieved From Sentinel-1 And Sentinel-2 Data Into Wofost Model To Improve Winter Wheat Yield Estimation

Coupling Remote Sensing Data and AquaCrop Model for Simulation of Winter Wheat Growth under Rainfed and Irrigated Conditions in a Mediterranean Environment

Mapping winter-wheat biomass and grain yield based on a crop model and UAV remote sensing

Estimation of Wheat Yield Based on Crop and Remote Sensing Assimilation Models

Bayesian Calibration of AquaCrop Model for Winter Wheat by Assimilating UAV Multi-Spectral Images

Comparison of Remote Sensing Yield Estimation Methods for Winter Wheat Based on Assimilating Time-Sequence LAI and ET

Nested Validation of Aquacrop Model for Simulation of Winter Wheat Grain Yield, Soil Moisture and Salinity Profiles under Simultaneous Salinity and Water Stress

Simulating Maize Productivity under Selected Climate Smart Agriculture Practices Using AquaCrop Model in a Sub-humid Environment

The Estimation of Maize Grain Protein Content and Yield by Assimilating LAI and LNA, Retrieved from Canopy Remote Sensing Data, into the DSSAT Model

Capability of a solar energy-driven crop model for simulating water consumption and yield of maize and its comparison with a water-driven crop model

Remote Sensing Data Assimilation in Crop Growth Modeling from an Agricultural Perspective: New Insights on Challenges and Prospects

Improving Winter Wheat Biomass and Evapotranspiration Simulation by Assimilating Leaf Area Index from Spectral Information into a Crop Growth Model