Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage of the pancreatic duct (EUS-PD) in postoperative anastomotic stenosis after previous pancreatic resection

Uwe Will,Frank Füldner,Theresa Buechner,Frank Meyer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2435-4888

2024-12-08

Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie

Abstract:As an alternative instead of a repeat surgical intervention, results (feasibility, safety, and technical and clinical success rate) of EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PD) in a consecutive patient cohort because of symptomatic postoperative anastomotic stenosis as part of a unicenter observational study in daily clinical practice are presented. EUS-guided puncture (19-G needle) of the pancreatic duct, pancreaticography, and advancement of a guide wire (0.035 inches) via the anastomosis into the small intestine after previous dilatation of the transgastric access site (using ring knife): 1. if possible, balloon dilatation of the anastomosis and placement of a prosthesis as a gastro-pancreaticojejunostomy ("ring drainage", "gastro-pancreaticojejunostomy"); 2. if not possible (frustrating advancement of the guide wire), again, dilatation of the transgastric access site (using ring knife) and balloon dilatation with a following transgastric placement of a prosthesis (pancreaticogastrostomy). Out of the complete consecutive patient series with EUS-PD ( n =119 cases) from 2004 to 2015, 34 patients (28.5%) were found with a medical history significant for previous surgical intervention at the pancreas who were approached using EUS-PD: in detail, pancreatic head resection in 1.) chronic pancreatitis ( n =21; 61.8%) and 2.) malignant tumor lesions ( n =13; 38.2%), resp. Pancreaticography was achieved in all subjects ( n =34/34; rate, 100%). In 9/34 cases, a sufficient flow of contrast media via the anastomotic segment was detected; therefore, drainage was not placed. In the remaining 25 cases, the primary technical success (successful placement of drainage) rate was 64% ( n =16/25 cases). In 9/25 patients, only dilatation using the passage of a ring knife over the guide wire and a balloon was performed. In detail, stent insertion was either not necessary because of good contrast flow via anastomosis ( n =4) or not successful because of dislocation of the guide wire ( n =5). However, these nine subjects underwent reintervention: in five patients, ring drainage ( n =3) and transgastric drainage ( n =2) were achieved, resulting in the definitive technical (drainage placement) success rate of 84% ( n =21/25). In further detail, the two different techniques of drainage insertion such as pancreaticogastrostomy and gastro-pancreaticojejunostomy (ring drainage) were used in 11 patients (plastic stent, n =8; metal stent, n =3 [biliary wallstent, n =2; LAMS, n =1]) and ten subjects, resp. Finally, long-term clinical success was 92% ( n =23/25). Overall, there were complications in 6/34 individuals (rate, 17.6%): bleeding, pressing ulcer by the stent, abscess within the lower sac, postinterventional pseudocyst (n=1 each), and paraluminal collection of contrast medium ( n =2). Alternative EUS-PD is feasible and safe and can avoid surgical intervention; this can result in a distinct improvement in the quality of life, including an acceptable interventional risk. Because of the high technical demands, EUS-PD should only be performed in centers of interventional EUS, with great expertise in this field. Further clinical long-term observation, greater patient cohorts, evaluation of procedural knowledge and data, and further technical advances are required. Als Alternative zur nochmaligen Operation werden die klinischen Ergebnisse (Machbarkeit, Sicherheit, technische und klinische Erfolgsrate) der EUS-geführten Pankreasgangdrainage (EUS-PD) bei symptomatischer postoperativer Anastomosenstenose an einer konsekutiven Patientenkohorte im Rahmen einer klinisch-systematischen unizentrischen Observationsstudie in täglicher klinischer Praxis vorgestellt. EUS-gestützte Punktion (19-G-Nadel) des Pankreasganges, Pankreatikographie, Vorschub eines Führungsdrahtes (0,035 Inch) in Richtung und über die Anastomose in den Dünndarm nach vorheriger Dilatation des transgastrischen Zugangsweges (mittels Ringmesser): 1. wenn möglich, Ballondehnung der Anastomose und Protheseneinlage i.S. einer Gastropancreaticojejunostomie ("Ringdrainage"); 2. wenn nicht möglich (frustraner Drahtvorschub): Erweiterung des transgastrischen Zuganges (mittels Ringmesser) und Ballondehnung mit folgender transgastrischer Prothesenanlage (Pancreaticogastrostomie). Von 2004–2015 wurden aus einer kompletten EUS-PD-Patientenserie von 119 Patienten 34 Fälle (28,5%) mit Z.n. Op (Pankreaskopfresektion 1. bei chronischer Pankreatitis [ n =21; 61,8%], 2. wegen malignen Tumors [ n =13; 38,2%]) einer EUS-PD-Patientenserie zugefü -Abstract Truncated-

gastroenterology & hepatology