Medication‐related incidents in acute care hospitals among different age groups: An analysis of national patient safety report data

Ji Min Han,Kyu‐Nam Heo,A Jeong Kim,Ah Young Lee,Sangil Min,Young‐Mi Ah,Ju‐Yeun Lee
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.5819
2024-05-25
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
Abstract:Purpose This study aimed to perform a nationwide analysis of medication errors (MEs) from hospitals using national reporting system data and to compare the ME patterns among different age groups. Methods We analyzed medication‐related incidents in acute care hospitals reported to the Korean Patient Safety Reporting and Learning System (KOPS), which is a patient safety reporting system, from July 2016 to December 2020. The stages of the medication use process, type of errors, medication class involved in MEs, and degree of harm were analyzed. Results Among a total of 5071 medication‐related incidents, 37.7% (1911 cases) were incidents that caused patient harm and 1.2% caused long‐term, permanent, and fatal harm. The proportion of medication‐related incidents that resulted in harm was the highest among the <1‐year‐old age group (67 cases, 51.5%), followed by the elderly (≥ 65 years) (828 cases, 40.9%). The cases leading to patient death were most frequently reported in patients aged ≥65 years. Medication‐related incidents occurred mainly in the administration stage (2954 cases, 58.3%), and wrong dose was the most frequently reported ME type. The most prevalent medication class occurring in the 20–64‐year age group (256 cases, 11.7%) was 'antibacterials for systemic use', whereas 'contrast media' (236 cases, 11.6%) and 'blood substitutes and perfusion solutions' (98 cases, 19.3%) were the most prevalent drug classes in the ≥65‐ and <20‐year‐old age groups, respectively. Conclusions It is necessary to establish guidelines for the prevention of medication‐related incidents according to the medication use process and patient age group.
pharmacology & pharmacy,public, environmental & occupational health
What problem does this paper attempt to address?