Abstract:Background: In quantitative biology, mathematical models are used to describe and analyze biological processes. The parameters of these models are usually unknown and need to be estimated from experimental data using statistical methods. In particular, Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods have become increasingly popular as they allow for a rigorous analysis of parameter and prediction uncertainties without the need for assuming parameter identifiability or removing non-identifiable parameters. A broad spectrum of MCMC algorithms have been proposed, including single- and multi-chain approaches. However, selecting and tuning sampling algorithms suited for a given problem remains challenging and a comprehensive comparison of different methods is so far not available. Results: We present the results of a thorough benchmarking of state-of-the-art single- and multi-chain sampling methods, including Adaptive Metropolis, Delayed Rejection Adaptive Metropolis, Metropolis adjusted Langevin algorithm, Parallel Tempering and Parallel Hierarchical Sampling. Different initialization and adaptation schemes are considered. To ensure a comprehensive and fair comparison, we consider problems with a range of features such as bifurcations, periodical orbits, multistability of steady-state solutions and chaotic regimes. These problem properties give rise to various posterior distributions including uni- and multi-modal distributions and non-normally distributed mode tails. For an objective comparison, we developed a pipeline for the semi-automatic comparison of sampling results. Conclusion: The comparison of MCMC algorithms, initialization and adaptation schemes revealed that overall multi-chain algorithms perform better than single-chain algorithms. In some cases this performance can be further increased by using a preceding multi-start local optimization scheme. These results can inform the selection of sampling methods and the benchmark collection can serve for the evaluation of new algorithms. Furthermore, our results confirm the need to address exploration quality of MCMC chains before applying the commonly used quality measure of effective sample size to prevent false analysis conclusions.

Efficiency of reversible MCMC methods: elementary derivations and applications to composite methods

Comparing the Efficiency of General State Space Reversible MCMC Algorithms

Efficient Irreversible Monte Carlo Samplers

New Diagnostic Assessment of MCMC Algorithm Effectiveness, Efficiency, Reliability, and Controllability

Control of Probability Flow in Markov Chain Monte Carlo -- Nonreversibility and Lifting

Unbiased Markov chain quasi-Monte Carlo for Gibbs samplers

Modifying Gibbs sampling to avoid self transitions

Unbiased Markov chain Monte Carlo methods with couplings

A large deviation principle for the empirical measures of Metropolis–Hastings chains

A large deviation principle for the empirical measures of Metropolis-Hastings chains

Post-Processing of MCMC

Non-Reversible Parallel Tempering: a Scalable Highly Parallel MCMC Scheme

Comprehensive benchmarking of Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for dynamical systems

Computational efficiency study of a micro-macro Markov chain Monte Carlo method for molecular dynamics

An invitation to adaptive Markov chain Monte Carlo convergence theory

No Free Lunch for Approximate MCMC

Convergence Speed and Approximation Accuracy of Numerical MCMC

Geometric ergodicity of trans-dimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms

A calculus for Markov chain Monte Carlo: studying approximations in algorithms

A non-asymptotic error analysis for parallel Monte Carlo estimation from many short Markov chains

Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive MCMC