UNDERSTANDING HOW PATIENTS WITH MODERATE-TO-SEVERE ULCERATIVE COLITIS DESCRIBE THE SPECTRUM OF BOWEL URGENCY DEFINITIONS: RESULTS FROM QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Marla Dubinsky,Theresa Hunter,Larissa Stassek,Gale Harding,Marissa Stefan,Tsion Fikre,Alison Potts Bleakman,Richard Moses
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izae020.169
2024-01-25
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Abstract:Abstract BACKGROUND Bowel urgency, the sudden or immediate need to have a bowel movement, is a burdensome symptom to patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). The objective of this study was to understand how adult patients with moderately-to-severely active UC describe bowel urgency remission and “no or minimal” bowel urgency. METHODS Qualitative phone interviews were conducted with adults with HCP-confirmed moderately-to-severely active UC. The interview included open-ended questions that elicited participant perceptions of bowel urgency remission, “no or minimal” and “normal” bowel urgency. Participants indicated which score on the 11-point Urgency Numeric Rating Scale (Urgency NRS; 0 [no urgency] to 10 [worst possible urgency]) they would use to describe “no or minimal” and “normal” bowel urgency. Participants were recruited from 6 clinical sites based in the United States. ATLAS.ti was used to organize the data. Descriptive statistics were used for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. RESULTS 19 adults with moderately-to-severely active UC participated in this study. Participants had a mean age of 48.1 years, 63% were female, 74% were white, and 58% were employed full-time. All participants had experienced bowel urgency and 79% (n=15/19) confirmed they had experienced a bowel-urgency related accident in the past. Most participants (n=18/19; 95%) defined bowel urgency remission as “feeling normal” with fewer bowel movements and reduced levels of bowel urgency and 4 participants (21%) defined bowel urgency remission as having a “good day” (Table 1). The impact of bowel urgency remission included the ability to partake in social/leisure activities and feeling less anxious overall (Table 2). Participants selected scores from 0 to 5 on the 11-point Urgency NRS to describe “no or minimal” bowel urgency with 5 (26%) indicating that “0 to 4” was the appropriate range, whereas 5 (26%) selected “0 to 2”. Other participants selected “0 to 3” (n=3/19; 16%), “0 to 1” (n=2/19; 11%), “0” (only) (n=2/19; 11%), “1 to 2” (n=1/19; 5%), and “0 to 5” (n=1/19; 5%). The majority of participants (n=15/19; 79%) described feeling “normal” and having minimal impacts when experiencing “no or minimal” bowel urgency. Participants were also asked to indicate the highest score on the Urgency NRS at which they could still consider their bowel urgency to be “normal” and 42% of participants (n=8/19) selected 5 as the highest score that they would still consider as “normal.” CONCLUSION These interviews provided evidence that among patients with moderately-to-severely active UC, bowel urgency can still be considered “no or minimal”, “normal” or in “remission” even when some amount of bowel urgency is present. In general, responses of “0” to “5” on the Urgency NRS were considered to correlate to “no or minimal” or “normal” bowel urgency.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to understand how patients with moderate - to - severe ulcerative colitis (UC) describe different definitions of bowel urgency, especially the definitions of "no or minimal" bowel urgency and "normal" bowel urgency. Specifically, the study aims to gain in - depth understanding of these patients' understanding of bowel urgency relief and its impact on quality of life through qualitative research methods. ### Research Background Bowel urgency is a common and troublesome symptom in patients with ulcerative colitis, manifested as a sudden or immediate need to defecate. This symptom not only affects patients' daily lives but may also lead to accidents, seriously affecting patients' quality of life. Therefore, understanding patients' definitions of bowel urgency relief and its impact on quality of life is of great significance for formulating more effective treatment and management strategies. ### Research Methods The research team conducted a qualitative study on 19 adult patients with moderate - to - severe active - phase ulcerative colitis diagnosed by medical professionals through telephone interviews. The interview content included open - ended questions, aiming to understand patients' perceptions of bowel urgency relief, "no or minimal" bowel urgency, and "normal" bowel urgency. Participants were also required to use an 11 - point Urgency Numeric Rating Scale (Urgency NRS; 0 represents no urgency, 10 represents the most severe urgency) to describe the score ranges they considered for "no or minimal" and "normal" bowel urgency. ### Main Findings - **Patient Characteristics**: The average age of the participants was 48.1 years, 63% were female, 74% were white, and 58% worked full - time. - **Bowel Urgency Experience**: All participants had experienced bowel urgency, and 79% of the participants had had accidents related to bowel urgency in the past. - **Definition of Bowel Urgency Relief**: Most participants (95%) defined bowel urgency relief as "feeling normal", manifested as fewer defecation times and a lower level of urgency. Some participants (21%) defined it as "a good day". - **Score for "No or Minimal" Bowel Urgency**: The score ranges selected by the participants were mainly concentrated between 0 and 5, among which 26% of the participants thought that 0 - 4 was an appropriate range, and 26% of the participants chose 0 - 2. - **Score for "Normal" Bowel Urgency**: 42% of the participants thought that 5 was the highest score at which they still considered bowel urgency to be "normal". ### Conclusion The research results show that even in the presence of a certain degree of bowel urgency, patients with moderate - to - severe active - phase ulcerative colitis may still describe it as "no or minimal" or "normal". These findings are helpful for better understanding patients' symptom experiences, providing clinicians with more accurate assessment tools, and guiding future treatment and management strategies. Through these studies, more personalized care plans can be provided for patients, improving patients' quality of life and treatment satisfaction.