Choice of blood collection methods influences extracellular vesicles counts and miRNA profiling
Vivian Tran,Getulio Pereira de Oliveira-Jr,Stephanie Chidester,Shulin Lu,Michelle L Pleet,Alexander R Ivanov,John Tigges,Moua Yang,Steven Jacobson,Maria C B Gonçalves,Alec A Schmaier,Jennifer Jones,Ionita C Ghiran
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jex2.70008
2024-10-22
Abstract:Circulating RNAs have been investigated systematically for over 20 years, both as constituents of circulating extracellular vesicles (EVs) or, more recently, non-EV RNA carriers, such as exomeres and supermeres. The high level of variability and low reproducibility rate of EV/extracellular RNA (exRNA) results generated even on the same biofluids promoted several efforts to limit pre-analytical variability by standardizing sample collection and sample preparation, along with instrument validation, setup and calibration. Anticoagulants (ACs) are often chosen based on the initial goal of the study and not necessarily for the later EV and/or exRNA analyses. We show the effects of blood collection on EV size, abundance, and antigenic composition, as well on the miRNAs. Our focus of this work was on the effect of ACs on the number and antigenic composition of circulating EVs and on a set of circulating miRNA species, which were shown to be relevant as disease markers in several cancers and Alzheimer's disease. Results show that while the number of plasma EVs, their relative size, and post-fluorescence labeling profile varied with each AC, their overall antigenic composition, with few exceptions, did not change significantly. However, the number of EVs expressing platelet and platelet-activation markers increased in serum samples. For overall miRNA expression levels, EDTA was a better AC, although this may have been associated with stimulation of cells in the blood collection tube. Citrate and serum rendered better results for a set of miRNAs that were described as circulating markers for Alzheimer's disease, colon, and papillary thyroid cancers.