Abstract:Objectives: This study aimed to validate the Collaborative Practice Assessment Tool (CPAT) in the Australian setting and provide a quality instrument in terms of psychometric properties that can be used to measure interprofessional outcomes for both healthcare practitioners and students. The outcomes evaluated include the capacity to work in an interprofessional team, good interprofessional communication skills, leadership skills, ensuring clear division of tasks and roles in a team, effective conflict management, and being actively involved with patients and their families/communities in care. Methods: The COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) taxonomy and standards were used as guides for evaluating the psychometric properties of the Australian CPAT, which include evaluations regarding instrument development requirements of sample target and size, content validity, internal structure (structural validity, internal consistency reliability and measurement invariance), and hypotheses testing. CPAT Australia was developed through two stages involving pilot studies and a validation study, both of which included healthcare practitioners and students as participants. A pilot study examined content validity regarding item relevance, item comprehensibility, and instrument comprehensiveness. The validation study was carried out to assess the internal structure of CPAT Australia for aspects of structural validity, internal consistency reliabilities, and configural, metric and scalar measurement invariance. The structural validity was explored using the following three steps: exploratory, confirmatory, and multi-group factor analysis. Construct validity was evaluated to confirm direct and indirect paths of assumptions based on a previously validated model. Data collected between August 2021 and May 2022. Results: The content validity evaluation confirmed that all items were relevant, understandable and comprehensive for measuring interprofessional collaborative care in Australia. Three hundred ninety-nine participants contributed to the validation study (n=152 practitioners; n=247 students). The original instrument model of 8-Factor 56-Item was improved in the Australian CPAT. Two items, Item 27 (Physicians assume the ultimate responsibility) and Item 49 (Final decision rest with the physician), were consistently rejected and therefore discarded. The internal structure of the 7-Factor 54-Item solution was confirmed as a suitable model with fit indices meeting COSMIN standards for a good model in practitioner and student cohorts. Configural, metric and scalar invariances were confirmed, indicating the invariance of the instruments when used for the practitioner and student cohorts. The construct validity evaluation indicated that 81.3% of direct and indirect assumptions were accepted, fulfilling the COSMIN requirement of >75% of proposed assumptions being accepted. Conclusion: The Australian CPAT with a 7-factor 54-item solution was confirmed as a quality measure for assessing interprofessional education and collaborative practice for both healthcare practitioners and students in Australia with robust psychometric properties.

Tracking trainee development: preliminary validation of a tool designed to evaluate clinical psychology competencies over time

Capacity Assessment Training and Competency Evaluation Tool

Virtual reality informs clinical observation tool

Evaluating psychotherapist competence: Testing the generalizability of clinical competence assessments of graduate trainees.

Physical Therapist Residency Competency-Based Education: Development of an Assessment Instrument

Competency-based pre-service education for clinical psychology training in low- and middle-income countries: Case study of Makerere University in Uganda

Introducing an assessment tool based on a full set of end-of-training EPAs to capture the workplace performance of final-year medical students

Knowledge of Problem Solving (KOPS) Scale: Design and Evaluation of a Digitally Administered Competence Measure for a Common Practice Element in Task-Shared Youth Mental Health Interventions

Reliability and validity of an auditing tool for person‐centred psychotherapy and counselling for young people: The PCEPS‐YP

Competence assessment of the clinical tutor: a multicentric observational study

Does a therapist's reflective ability predict the accuracy of their self-evaluation of competence in cognitive behavioural therapy?

Development and Initial Psychometrics for a Therapist Competence Instrument for CBT for Youth Anxiety

The competency index for clinical research professionals: a potential tool for competency-based clinical research academic program evaluation

An evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Australian Collaborative Practice Assessment Tool

A Pilot Study of the Creation and Implementation of a Teaching Development Assessment Tool

Developing and validating a self-assessment tool for health promotion competencies with training participants in Austria

Validation of a Clinical Teaching Competency Framework for Physical Therapists: A Mixed-Methods Approach

Measuring the Quality of Nursing Clinical Placements. Development of the Placement Evaluation Tool (PET): A Mixed Methods Co-design Project

Measuring deliberate reflection in residents: validation and psychometric properties of a measurement tool

Multicultural Training Experiences as Predictors of Psychology Students' Cultural Competence

Construct validity test of evaluation tool for professional behaviors of entry-level occupational therapy students in the United States