Error estimation in current noisy quantum computers

Borge, Juan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-024-04384-z
IF: 1.965
2024-05-12
Quantum Information Processing
Abstract:One of the main important features of the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era is the correct evaluation and consideration of errors. In this paper, we analyse the main sources of errors in current (IBM) quantum computers and we present a useful tool (TED-qc) designed to facilitate the total error probability expected for any quantum circuit. We propose this total error probability as the best way to estimate a lower bound for the fidelity in the NISQ era, avoiding the necessity of comparing the quantum calculations with any classical one. In order to contrast the robustness of our tool we compute the total error probability that may occur in three different quantum models: 1) the Ising model, 2) the Quantum-Phase Estimation (QPE), and 3) the Grover's algorithm. For each model, the main quantities of interest are computed and benchmarked against the reference simulator's results as a function of the error probability for a representative and statistically significant sample size. The analysis is satisfactory in more than the of the cases. In addition, we study how error mitigation techniques are able to eliminate the noise induced during the measurement. These results have been calculated for the IBM quantum computers, but both the tool and the analysis can be easily extended to any other quantum computer.
physics, multidisciplinary,quantum science & technology, mathematical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is the error evaluation and control issues in current noisy intermediate - scale quantum (NISQ) computers. Specifically, the paper analyzes the main sources of error in current IBM quantum computers and proposes a tool (TED - qc) for estimating the total error probability of any quantum circuit. The author believes that this total error probability is the best way to estimate the lower limit of fidelity in the NISQ era, avoiding the need to compare quantum computing results with classical computing results. ### Main Research Contents 1. **Analysis of Error Sources**: - The paper first analyzes the main sources of error in NISQ devices, including: - **Errors Caused by Qubit Instability**: The state stability of qubits is usually on the order of several hundred microseconds, so long - time calculations will increase the probability of error. - **Errors Caused by Quantum Gate Operations**: Operations of single - qubit gates and two - qubit gates will introduce errors, among which the error rate of two - qubit gates is higher. - **Errors in the Measurement Process**: Each time the state of a qubit is measured, an error will be introduced. 2. **Tool Development**: - A tool named TED - qc has been developed to calculate the total error probability of a given quantum circuit by connecting to IBM's API. This tool takes into account all of the above error sources and can provide accurate total error probability estimates for different quantum circuits. 3. **Algorithm Testing**: - To verify the effectiveness of the tool, the paper selects three representative quantum algorithms for testing: - **Ising Model**: Calculate the magnetization intensity. - **Quantum Phase Estimation (QPE)**: Calculate the phase. - **Grover's Algorithm**: Calculate the probability of finding the target element. - For each algorithm, the total error probability on different quantum computers and different qubit chains is calculated and compared with the results of the reference simulator. 4. **Error Mitigation Techniques**: - The effect of the measurement error mitigation technique in Qiskit is evaluated. This technique eliminates the errors introduced in the measurement process by generating a matrix containing all basis - state measurements. Although this technique is effective in small - scale circuits, the computational cost is high in large - scale circuits. ### Conclusions - **Reliability Verification**: By comparing experimental results with simulation results, the paper proves the reliability and effectiveness of the TED - qc tool. In more than 99% of cases, the total error probability calculated by the tool is consistent with the actual error. - **Error Mitigation**: The measurement error mitigation technique in Qiskit can significantly reduce the errors in the measurement process, but its computational cost rises sharply as the number of qubits increases. - **Future Prospects**: The tools and methods proposed in the paper are not only applicable to IBM quantum computers but can also be extended to other quantum computers, providing important support for quantum computing in the NISQ era. In conclusion, through the development and verification of the TED - qc tool, this paper provides a reliable error evaluation method for quantum computing in the NISQ era, which helps to improve the reliability and accuracy of quantum computing.