Responsiveness, Social Connection, Hope, and Life Satisfaction in Everyday Social Interaction: An Experience Sampling Study

Andy J. Merolla,Andreas B. Neubauer,Christopher D. Otmar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-024-00710-5
IF: 4.087
2024-01-24
Journal of Happiness Studies
Abstract:What are the specific everyday communication experiences—from across people's social networks—that contribute to well-being? In the present work, we focus on the effects of perceived partner responsiveness in social interactions on various well-being outcomes. We hypothesized that everyday moments of responsiveness indirectly support two key estimates of well-being (hope and life satisfaction) through feelings of social connection. Data were obtained in an experience sampling study collected across ten days ( N = 120). Results of dynamic structural equation modeling (DSEM) showed that responsive interaction predicted increases in hope (but not life satisfaction) through social connection. Results also identified reciprocal within-person links between responsive interaction and social connection throughout the day. These findings underscore the importance of responsive everyday communication for fostering social connection across different types of relationships and for supporting people's capacity for a hopeful life. We discuss the implications of these results for continued research of responsiveness, hope theory, and well-being from a social interaction lens. On a practical level, the mediation pathway involving hope suggests how small changes in our patterns of everyday social interaction can be consequential to the quality of our lives.
social sciences, interdisciplinary,psychology, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The core problem that this paper attempts to solve is how to understand the specific impact of perceived partner responsiveness in daily social interactions on well - being. Specifically, the research focuses on the following aspects: 1. **Understanding the "downstream consequences" of perceived partner responsiveness**: - The research attempts to further explore the direct and indirect impacts of perceived partner responsiveness in daily life. These impacts can be divided into proximal and distal. Proximal impacts involve immediate cognitive and emotional state changes, while distal impacts involve long - term individual - level changes, such as well - being, mental health, etc. 2. **Responsiveness interactions within the network**: - Most research on responsiveness has focused on interactions between specific relationship partners (such as couples). This study expands this area by considering the wide range of social interactions that people have with various types of people (including acquaintances and strangers) every day. By sampling these wide - ranging social interactions, the study aims to reveal the greater impact of responsiveness interactions on well - being. 3. **Intra - day predictors of responsiveness interactions**: - The research also explores what factors may make people more likely to perceive responsiveness in daily interactions. For example, whether feelings earlier in the day will affect the perception of responsiveness later. 4. **Long - term impacts of responsiveness on hope and life satisfaction**: - The research uses a multilevel mediation model to explore how responsiveness interactions indirectly affect hope and life satisfaction through the sense of social connection. Specifically, the study hypothesizes that responsiveness interactions will increase people's sense of social connection, thereby enhancing their hope levels and life satisfaction. ### Main Hypotheses - **H1**: Perceived partner responsiveness in daily interactions positively predicts the current (i.e., immediate) feeling of connection with others. - **H2**: The sense of connection mediates the impact of perceived partner responsiveness on changes in hope in social interactions. - **H3**: The sense of connection mediates the impact of perceived partner responsiveness on changes in life satisfaction in social interactions. ### Method Overview To test these hypotheses, the research used the experience sampling method to collect data from 120 participants over 10 days. Participants were required to complete six short questionnaires each day to record their social interaction experiences at that time. The research also used Dynamic Structural Equation Modeling (DSEM) to analyze the data. Through these methods, the study aims to reveal how responsiveness in daily social interactions promotes individuals' hope and life satisfaction by enhancing the sense of social connection, thereby providing a new perspective for understanding and enhancing people's well - being.