Analysis of cell–cell interaction between mural granulosa cells and cumulus granulosa cells during ovulation using single‐cell RNA sequencing data of mouse ovary

Yuichiro Shirafuta,Isao Tamura,Amon Shiroshita,Taishi Fujimura,Ryo Maekawa,Toshiaki Taketani,Norihiro Sugino
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12564
2024-02-16
Reproductive Medicine and Biology
Abstract:Abstract Purpose We investigated the interactions between mural granulosa cells (MGCs) and cumulus granulosa cells (CGCs) during ovulation after the LH surge. Methods We performed clustering, pseudotime, and interactome analyses utilizing reported single‐cell RNA sequencing data of mouse ovary at 6 h after eCG‐hCG injection. Results Clustering analysis classified granulosa cells into two distinct populations, MGCs and CGCs. Pseudotime analysis divided granulosa cells into before and after the LH surge, and further divided them into two branches, the ovulatory MGCs and the ovulatory CGCs. Interactome analysis was performed to identify the interactions between MGCs and CGCs. Twenty‐six interactions were acting from CGCs toward MGCs, involving ovulation and steroidogenesis. Thirty‐six interactions were acting from MGCs toward CGCs, involving hyaluronan synthesis. There were 25 bidirectional interactions, involving the EGFR pathway. In addition, we found three novel interactions: Ephrins–Ephs pathway and Wnt–Lrp6 pathway from CGCs to MGCs, associated with steroidogenesis and lipid transport, respectively, and TGF‐β–TGFBR1 pathway from MGCs to CGCs, associated with hyaluronan synthesis. Conclusions MGCs and CGCs interact with each other in the preovulatory follicle after the LH surge, and their interactions have roles in corpus luteum formation, oocyte maturation, and follicle rupture.
obstetrics & gynecology,reproductive biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?