Abstract:Machine learning algorithms find frequent application in spatial prediction of biotic and abiotic environmental variables. However, the characteristics of spatial data, especially spatial autocorrelation, are widely ignored. We hypothesize that this is problematic and results in models that can reproduce training data but are unable to make spatial predictions beyond the locations of the training samples. We assume that not only spatial validation strategies but also spatial variable selection is essential for reliable spatial predictions. We introduce two case studies that use remote sensing to predict land cover and the leaf area index for the "Marburg Open Forest", an open research and education site of Marburg University, Germany. We use the machine learning algorithm Random Forests to train models using non-spatial and spatial cross-validation strategies to understand how spatial variable selection affects the predictions. Our findings confirm that spatial cross-validation is essential in preventing overoptimistic model performance. We further show that highly autocorrelated predictors (such as geolocation variables, e.g. latitude, longitude) can lead to considerable overfitting and result in models that can reproduce the training data but fail in making spatial predictions. The problem becomes apparent in the visual assessment of the spatial predictions that show clear artefacts that can be traced back to a misinterpretation of the spatially autocorrelated predictors by the algorithm. Spatial variable selection could automatically detect and remove such variables that lead to overfitting, resulting in reliable spatial prediction patterns and improved statistical spatial model performance. We conclude that in addition to spatial validation, a spatial variable selection must be considered in spatial predictions of ecological data to produce reliable predictions.

Spatial prediction variance estimation based on covariance penalty

Clustering and Prediction with Variable Dimension Covariates

Estimating the prediction performance of spatial models via spatial k-fold cross validation

Penalized Sparse Covariance Regression with High Dimensional Covariates

The Spatial Kernel Predictor based on Huge Observation Sets

Hybrid Parametric Classes of Isotropic Covariance Functions for Spatial Random Fields

Balancing spatial and non-spatial variation in varying coefficient modeling: a remedy for spurious correlation

Spatial local M-estimation under association

Spatial confounding under infill asymptotics

Valid model-free spatial prediction

Fast Two-Stage Variational Bayesian Approach to Estimating Panel Spatial Autoregressive Models with Unrestricted Spatial Weights Matrices

Ridge-Type Pretest and Shrinkage Estimation Strategies in Spatial Error Models with an Application to a Real Data Example

Robust Variable Selection with Exponential Squared Loss for the Spatial Single-Index Varying-Coefficient Model

Importance of spatial predictor variable selection in machine learning applications -- Moving from data reproduction to spatial prediction

Spatial+: a novel approach to spatial confounding

A NAIVE LEAST SQUARES METHOD FOR SPATIAL AUTOREGRESSION WITH COVARIATES

Consistent Validation for Predictive Methods in Spatial Settings

A goodness-of-fit test for regression models with spatially correlated errors

Spatially Clustered Varying Coefficient Model

Prediction and model evaluation for space-time data

A Low Rank Gaussian Process Prediction Model for Very Large Datasets