Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To compare the efficiency and effect of establishing rat peri-implantitis model by traditional cotton thread ligation and local injection of Porphyromonas gingivalis lipopolysaccharide (LPS) around the implant, as well as the combination of the two methods. METHODS:Left side maxillary first molars of 39 male SD rats were extracted, and titanium implants were implanted after four weeks of healing. After 4 weeks of implant osseointegration, 39 rats were randomly divided into 4 groups. Cotton thread ligation (n=12), local injection of LPS around the implant (n=12), and the two methods combined (n=12) were used to induce peri-implantitis, the rest 3 rats were untreated as control group. All procedures were conducted under 5% isoflurane inhalation anesthesia. The rats were sacrificed 2 weeks and 4 weeks after induction through carbon dioxide asphyxiation method. The maxilla of the rats in the test groups were collected and marginal bone loss was observed by micro-CT. The gingival tissues around the implants were collected for further real time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analysis, specifically the expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) as well as interleukin-1β (IL-1β). The probing depth (PD), bleeding on probing (BOP) and gingival index (GI) of each rat in the experimental group were recorded before induction of inflammation and before death. RESULTS:After 4 weeks of implantation, the osseointegration of implants were confirmed. All the three test groups showed red and swollen gums, obvious marginal bone loss around implants. After 2 weeks and 4 weeks of inflammation induction, PD, GI and BOP of the three test groups increased compared with those before induction, but only BOP was statistically significant among the three test groups (P < 0.05). At the end of 2 weeks of inflammation induction, marginal bone loss was observed at each site in the cotton thread ligation group and the combined group. At each site, the bone resorption in the combined group was greater than that in the cotton thread ligation group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05), bone resorption was observed at some sites of some implants in LPS local injection group. At the end of 4 weeks of inflammation induction, marginal bone loss was observed at all sites in each group. The marginal bone loss in the cotton thread ligation group and the combined group was greater than that in the LPS local injection group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). At the end of 2 weeks and 4 weeks of induction, the expression of TNF-α and IL-1β in the test groups were higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION:Compared with local injection of LPS around the implant, cotton thread ligature and the two methods combined can induce peri-implantitis in rats better and faster.

Th-Cell Subsets of Submandibular Lymph Nodes in Peri-Implantitis

Detection of T-forsythia and Other Important Bacteria in Crestal and Subcrestal Implants with Ligature-Induced Peri-Implant Infection in Dogs

The Characteristics of Microbiome and Cytokines in Healthy Implants and Peri-Implantitis of the Same Individuals

The Occurrence of Peri-Implant Mucositis Associated with the Shift of Submucosal Microbiome in Patients with a History of Periodontitis During the First Two Years.

Analysis of Th Cell Subsets in Local and Systemic Environments from Experimental Periodontitis Rats.

[Comparison of Three Methods for Establishing Rat Peri-Implantitis Model].

[Influence of the Peri-Implantitis to the Microscrew-Bone Interface].

Role of Immune Dysregulation in Peri-Implantitis

Ligature-Induced Peri-Implant Infection In Crestal And Subcrestal Implants: A Clinical And Radiographic Study In Dogs

Single-cell analysis of peri-implant gingival tissue to assess implant biocompatibility and immune response

Single‐cell analysis reveals a unique microenvironment in peri‐implantitis

TLR4 mediates alveolar bone resorption in experimental peri-implantitis through regulation of CD45<SUP>+</SUP> cell infiltration, RANKL/OPG ratio, and inflammatory cytokine production

Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Gingival Immune-Mediated Inflammation in Peri-Implantitis and Periodontitis Within the Same Host Environment

CXCL5/CXCL8 induces neutrophilic inflammation in peri-implantitis

Reosseointegration Following Regenerative Therapy of Tissue-Engineered Bone in A Canine Model of Experimental Peri-Implantitis

Oral Microbial Profile Variation During Canine Ligature-Induced Peri-Implantitis Development

MicroRNA Sequence and Function Analysis in Peri-Implantitis and Periodontitis: an Animal Study.

Temporal and spatial expression analysis of periostin in mice periodontitis model

Clinical, microbiological, and immunological aspects of healthy versus peri-implantitis tissue in full arch reconstruction patients: a prospective cross-sectional study

Imbalance of Interleukin-17+ T-cell and Foxp3+ Regulatory T-cell Dynamics in Rat Periapical Lesions.

Immune dysregulation and macrophage polarization in peri-implantitis