Abstract:Non-targeted analysis provides a comprehensive approach to analyze environmental and biological samples for nearly all chemicals present. One of the main shortcomings of current analytical methods and workflows is that they are unable to provide any quantitative information constituting an important obstacle in understanding environmental fate and human exposure. Herein, we present an in silico quantification method using mahine-learning for chemicals analyzed using electrospray ionization (ESI). We considered three data sets from different instrumental setups: (i) capillary electrophoresis electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (CE-MS) in positive ionization mode (ESI+), (ii) liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF/MS) in ESI+ and (iii) LC-QTOF/MS in negative ionization mode (ESI−). We developed and applied two different machine-learning algorithms: a random forest (RF) and an artificial neural network (ANN) to predict the relative response factors (RRFs) of different chemicals based on their physicochemical properties. Chemical concentrations can then be calculated by dividing the measured abundance of a chemical, as peak area or peak height, by its corresponding RRF. We evaluated our models and tested their predictive power using 5-fold cross-validation (CV) and y randomization. Both the RF and the ANN models showed great promise in predicting RRFs. However, the accuracy of the predictions was dependent on the data set composition and the experimental setup. For the CE-MS ESI+ data set, the best model predicted measured RRFs with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.19 log units and a cross-validation coefficient of determination (Q2) of 0.84 for the testing set. For the LC-QTOF/MS ESI+ data set, the best model predicted measured RRFs with an MAE of 0.32 and a Q2 of 0.40. For the LC-QTOF/MS ESI– data set, the best model predicted measured RRFs with a MAE of 0.50 and a Q2 of 0.20. Our findings suggest that machine-learning algorithms can be used for predicting concentrations of nontargeted chemicals with reasonable uncertainties, especially in ESI+, while the application on ESI– remains a more challenging problem.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.9b01096?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.9b01096</a>.Chemical names and physicochemical descriptors of the chemicals in the CE-MS ESI+ data set (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.jcim.9b01096/suppl_file/ci9b01096_si_001.xlsx">XLSX</a>)Chemical names and physicochemical descriptors of the chemicals in the LC-QTOF/MS data sets (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.jcim.9b01096/suppl_file/ci9b01096_si_002.xlsx">XLSX</a>)Information on the design of the algorithms and the optimization of the hyperparameters (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.jcim.9b01096/suppl_file/ci9b01096_si_003.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

Use of Modern Computational Methods and Neural Networks to Optimize Methods for LC/MS/MS Analysis of Military-Relevant Organophosphorus Compounds

Optimization of LC-MS2 Data Acquisition Parameters for Molecular Networking Applied to Marine Natural Products

Response Surface Methodology As a New Approach for Finding Optimal MALDI Matrix Spraying Parameters for Mass Spectrometry Imaging

The use of fast molecular descriptors and artificial neural networks approach in organochlorine compounds electron ionization mass spectra classification

Deep Neural Networks for Classification of LC-MS Spectral Peaks.

A Multi-Label Classifier for Predicting the Most Appropriate Instrumental Method for the Analysis of Contaminants of Emerging Concern

Applications of Machine Learning to In Silico Quantification of Chemicals without Analytical Standards

Machine learning methods for compound annotation in non‐targeted mass spectrometry—A brief overview of fingerprinting, in silico fragmentation and de novo methods

Prediction of mass spectrometry ionization efficiency based on COSMO-RS and machine learning algorithms

A stochastic approach for parameter optimization of feature detection algorithms for non-target screening in mass spectrometry

Benchtop volatilomics supercharged: How machine learning based design of experiment helps optimizing untargeted GC-IMS gas phase metabolomics

Assigning precursor–product ion relationships in indiscriminant MS/MS data from non-targeted metabolite profiling studies

Harmonized quality assurance/quality control provisions to assess completeness and robustness of MS1 data preprocessing for LC-HRMS-based suspect screening and non-targeted analysis

Estimating LoD-s Based on the Ionization Efficiency Values for the Reporting and Harmonization of Amenable Chemical Space in Nontargeted Screening LC/ESI/HRMS

Multiple testing issues in discriminating compound-related peaks and chromatograms from high frequency noise, spikes and solvent-based noise in LC-MS data sets

Challenges and future directions in LC-MS-based multiclass method development for the quantification of food contaminants

Machine Learning for Absolute Quantification of Unidentified Compounds in Non-Targeted LC/HRMS

Towards Unbiased Evaluation of Ionization Performance in LC-HRMS Metabolomics Method Development

Comprehensive LC-MS/MS Analysis of Nitrogen-Related Plant Metabolites

Research progress on nanomaterial-based matrices for matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry analysis

OptiMS: An Accessible Program for Automating Mass Spectrometry Parameter Optimization and Configuration