Abstract:Purpose The authors aim to develop and test a theory of dual responsibility to explain the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and firm performance. The authors empirically examine whether firms that meet their economic and social responsibilities simultaneously perform better than firms that fail to do so. In doing so, the authors theoretically extend and empirically test Barney's (2018) call to incorporate the stakeholder perspective with resource-based view (RBV). The authors also examine the moderating effects of firm status on this relationship. Design/methodology/approach The authors use a longitudinal panel sample of 137 S&P 500 firms and data for the years between 2004 and 2013 collected from multiple data sources. The authors use stochastic frontiers analysis to measure firm capabilities in the areas of R&D, operations and marketing. These capability measures are then used along with CSR measures and a measure of firm status to test the hypotheses of this study. The authors also conducted several robustness checks and various supplementary analyses using different econometrics techniques and different operationalizations of the key variables of interests. Findings The results show that firm CSR is positively related to firm performance and that the effect of CSR on performance is stronger for firms with higher levels of R&D capability and operational capability. The authors also find support for the three-way interaction between CSR, economic responsibility and firm status, suggesting that firms high in both social and economic responsibilities and status will enjoy the highest levels of performance. Research limitations/implications The findings of this study are based on large, publicly listed firms in North America. Therefore, their generalizability to other contexts and other types of firms require additional research. The reliance on KLD measures is also a limitation, especially because they have not reported CSR ratings after 2013. Practical implications For practicing managers, the main implication of this study is that an optimal balance between market and nonmarket strategies is key for superior performance. Social implications The continued debate regarding the firm's purpose can be understood by focusing equally on the two main responsibilities of firms: nonsocial responsibility and social responsibility toward all stakeholders. Originality/value The study answers the call to incorporate stakeholder theory into the RBV of the firm by highlighting the critical role of firm capabilities in the relationship between CSR and performance. The study also highlights the role that firm status plays in the relationship between market and nonmarket strategies and firm performance.

Investigating the varying relevance of CSR dimensions on firm leverage: The implications for internationalized firms

Understanding the dynamics of capital structure, corporate governance, and corporate social responsibility in high- and low-leveraged US and Chinese firms

Do CSR performance and reporting facilitate access to debt financing in emerging markets? The role of asset structure and firm performance

Does corporate social responsibility reduce the costs of high leverage? Evidence from capital structure and product market interactions

Corporate Social Responsibility and its Nexus with Firm Performance and Institutional Ownership: An Emerging Market Context

A Meta-Analytic Review of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance

Corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The roles of stakeholder orientation and financial transparency

Does corporate social responsibility mediate the relationship between board diversity and financial distress: evidence from an emerging economy?

Does CSR Moderate the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Chinese Firm’s Financial Performance? Evidence from the Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE) Firms

Corporate social responsibility and firm financial risk reduction: On the moderating role of the legal environment

Performance, Risk, and Cost of Capital: Trends and Opportunities for Future CSR Research

CSR transparency and firm value: Is the connection differential for cost leaders and differentiators?

Industry and Stakeholder Impacts on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Financial Performance: Consumer vs. Industrial Sectors

Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: a theory of dual responsibility

Unravelling the CSR-financial distress link: The mediating role of capital structure in Jordan’s financial sector

The role of creditor rights on capital structure and product market interactions: International evidence

The Impact of Culture and Religion in Financing Decisions: The Moderating Role of CSR

The influence of corporate social responsibility and social values on bank performance: A global study

Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: The moderation of investment horizon and corporate governance

Corporate capital structure in BRICS economies: An integrated analysis of ESG, firm, industry, and macroeconomic determinants

Does corporate social responsibility mediate the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance? Empirical evidence from BRICS countries