Printability disparities in heterogeneous material combinations via laser directed energy deposition: a comparative study

Jinsheng Ning,Lida Zhu,Shuhao Wang,Zhichao Yang,Peihua Xu,Pengsheng Xue,Hao Lu,Miao Yu,Yunhang Zhao,Jiachen Li,Susmita Bose,Amit Bandyopadhyay
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-7990/ad172f
2024-01-06
International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing
Abstract:Additive manufacturing provides achievability for the fabrication of bimetallic and multi-material structures; however, the material compatibility and bondability directly affect the parts' formability and final quality. It is essential to understand the underlying printability of different material combinations based on an adapted process. Here, the printability disparities of two common and attractive material combinations (nickel- and iron-based alloys) are evaluated at the macro and micro levels via laser directed energy deposition (DED). The deposition processes were captured using in situ high-speed imaging, and the dissimilarities in melt pool features and track morphology were quantitatively investigated within specific process windows. Moreover, the microstructure diversity of the tracks and blocks processed with varied material pairs was comparatively elaborated and, complemented with the informative multi-physics modeling, the presented non-uniformity in mechanical properties (microhardness) among the heterogeneous material pairs was rationalized. The differences in melt flow induced by the unlike thermophysical properties of the material pairs and the resulting element intermixing and localized re-alloying during solidification dominate the presented dissimilarity in printability among the material combinations. This work provides an in-depth understanding of the phenomenological differences in the deposition of dissimilar materials and aims to guide more reliable DED forming of bimetallic parts.
engineering, manufacturing,materials science, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: during the laser - directed energy deposition (DED) process, the differences in printability of different material combinations and their impact on the forming quality and final performance. Specifically, the research aims to evaluate the differences in printability during the DED process at the macro and micro levels by comparing two common and attractive material combinations, nickel - based alloys and iron - based alloys. ### Research Background Additive manufacturing (AM) provides the feasibility for the manufacturing of bimetallic and multi - material structures, but the compatibility and bonding of materials directly affect the formability and final quality of parts. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the printability of different material combinations under the adaptation of process conditions. Nickel - based alloys and steel are often selected as research objects in bimetallic research. In particular, Inconel (a nickel - based alloy) is widely used in the aerospace industry due to its excellent high - temperature mechanical properties, antioxidant and corrosion - resistant properties; while stainless steel (SS) is widely used in many applications due to its economy and good corrosion - resistant and mechanical properties. However, the interface between these heterogeneous materials is often the weakest part in bimetallic structures and is prone to form intermetallic phases. ### Research Objectives In this study, through single - track formation experiments, using nickel - based alloy and iron - based alloy powders and substrates as research materials, the differences in printability of different material combinations during the laser - directed energy deposition process were explored. The research captured the characteristics of the molten pool and the morphology of the trajectory during the deposition process by using a high - speed camera, and analyzed the microstructural diversity and the non - uniformity of mechanical properties (such as microhardness) in combination with multi - physical field modeling. The study found that due to the dynamic changes in melt flow caused by the differences in thermophysical properties of different material combinations, as well as the phenomena of element mixing and local re - alloying, these material combinations have significant differences in printability. ### Main Contents 1. **Experimental Methods**: - Use a five - axis machine tool center for deposition experiments, and combine a high - precision high - speed camera to record the dynamic behavior of the molten pool in real time. - Select different material combinations (nickel - based alloys and iron - based alloys) and parameter sets as controllable variables, and set up corresponding control groups. 2. **Results and Discussions**: - **Molten Pool Behavior and Trajectory Morphology**: Images recorded by the high - speed camera show that there are significant differences in the molten pool fluctuation and splash characteristics of different material combinations. For example, the combination of nickel - based alloy with nickel - based alloy or nickel - based alloy with iron - based alloy exhibits stronger molten pool convection and surface fluctuation, while the combination of iron - based alloy with iron - based alloy is relatively stable. - **Microstructure and Mechanical Properties**: Through means such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy - dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and electron back - scatter diffraction (EBSD), the differences in microstructure and microhardness of different material combinations were studied. The results show that there are significant differences in molten pool size, shape and mechanical properties among different material combinations. ### Conclusions This research reveals the differences in printability of different material combinations during the laser - directed energy deposition process, especially in terms of molten pool dynamic behavior, microstructure and mechanical properties. These findings are helpful to guide the more reliable DED forming of bimetallic parts and optimize their functionality and mechanical properties. ### Formula Summary - **Energy Density (ED)**: \( \text{ED}=\frac{P}{S\times d_0} \), where \( P \) is the laser power (W), \( S \) is the scanning speed (mm/min), and \( d_0 \) is the laser beam waist diameter (3 mm). - **Molten Pool Width - to - Depth Ratio**: \( \frac{d}{w} \), where \( d \) is the molten pool depth (mm) and \( w \) is the molten pool width (mm). Through these studies, the author hopes to provide theoretical support and technical guidance for the reliable manufacturing of more complex multi - material structures in the future.