Clinical effect of different concentrations of ropivacaine in the labor analgesia of dural puncture epidural technique for obese puerperae

Liping Shi,Difei Zhang,Pengfei Ye,Weihua Peng,Yan Yin and Ye Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-024-00363-1
2024-02-17
Perioperative Medicine
Abstract:This study was performed to analyze the clinical effect of different concentrations of ropivacaine in the labor analgesia of the dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique for obese puerperae.
surgery,anesthesiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper aims to analyze the clinical effects of different concentrations of ropivacaine in labor analgesia using the dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique in obese parturients. The study selected 150 obese parturients who were giving birth for the first time and randomly divided them into three groups, each receiving 0.075%, 0.10%, and 0.125% ropivacaine combined with sufentanil (0.5 μg/ml) for epidural analgesia. The primary evaluation indicators included visual analog scale (VAS), Ramsay scale, Bromage scale, as well as the onset time of analgesia, duration of analgesia, time to first patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) press, number of PCEA presses, ropivacaine consumption, delivery time, changes in maternal blood pressure and heart rate, neonatal umbilical artery blood gas analysis, and Apgar scores. The results showed that the onset time of analgesia, number of PCEA presses, and ropivacaine consumption in the 0.125% ropivacaine group were lower than those in the 0.075% and 0.10% groups; however, the duration of analgesia and time to first PCEA were longer. In terms of VAS scores, the 0.075% group had higher pain scores at multiple time points compared to the 0.10% and 0.125% groups. The Ramsay scale indicated that the 0.10% and 0.125% groups had higher scores at some time points compared to the 0.075% group, and the Bromage scale showed that the 0.125% group had higher scores at all time points compared to the other two groups. The second stage of labor was longer in the 0.10% and 0.125% groups, with the 0.125% group having a longer second stage than the 0.10% group. Additionally, the maternal blood pressure and heart rate in the 0.10% group were closer to normal values. Different concentrations of ropivacaine had no significant effect on neonatal umbilical artery blood gas analysis indicators and 1-minute and 5-minute Apgar scores. The incidence of adverse reactions was higher in the 0.125% group compared to the 0.075% and 0.10% groups. The conclusion is that 0.1% ropivacaine combined with 0.5 μg/ml sufentanil through the DPE technique provides good analgesic effects and fewer adverse reactions in labor analgesia for obese parturients.