A comparison between the Coleman homophily index and BA-homophily metric with a random network of unequal group sizes

Eun Lee,Jiyoung Kang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40042-024-01013-x
2024-02-21
Journal of the Korean Physical Society
Abstract:The Coleman homophily index is widely acknowledged across various disciplines as a key metric to assess a preference for making a relationship between people alike. However, a new metric known as the Barabási-Albert homophily (BA-homophily) metric has been introduced recently, incorporating a degree-preference mechanism in network formation to assess homophily. This additional consideration in the BA-homophily model can suggest potential deviations from the conventional Coleman homophily index. In this study, we derived an analytical relationship between the Coleman homophily and the BA-homophily, utilizing the BA-homophily model's parameters to understand the deviations between the two measures. This approach has allowed us to compare the homophilic ranges of these measures, highlighting the different homophily ranges they cover. We also identified that specific ranges of these measures can reach contrasting homophily tendencies for the same network when using a generative random network model. Furthermore, the Coleman homophily index exhibits size dependency, leading to an inaccurate asymmetric homophily portrayal in networks with a symmetric connection preference. These findings underscore the importance of researchers exercising caution when applying homophily measures, emphasizing the need to consider group size imbalances. It prompts a call for further investigation into the biases that homophily measures may introduce.
physics, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?