Agreement between Body Composition Estimates using a 2D Imaging System Across different Body Positions and Days

Casey J. Metoyer,Katherine Sullivan,Lee J. Winchester,Mark T. Richardson,Michael R. Esco,Michael V. Fedewa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367x.2024.2434232
2024-12-08
Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science
Abstract:Relative adiposity (%Fat) was measured using a smartphone-based application in a convenience sample of adults aged 20–52 years ( n = 32, 68.7% female, 84.3% White/Caucasian, 26.7 ± 3.5 kg/m 2 ) across different body positions (Anterior versus Posterior) on consecutive days (Day 1 versus Day 2). A reference photo was obtained from the posterior view on Day 1 (POST Day1 ), with an additional photo obtained from the anterior view (ANT Day1 ). A third photo from the posterior view was obtained on Day 2 (POST Day2 ). Potential differences were assessed using an adjusted alpha level ( p < .025). ANT Day1 (26.44 ± 6.19%Fat) was not different than POST Day1 (26.84 ± 6.07%Fat, MAPE = 3.63%, p = .04) (ICC = 0.99, SEE = 1.1%Fat, p < .001). In addition, POST Day2 (26.65 ± 6.17%Fat) was not different than POST Day1 (MAPE = 3.30%, p = .31) (ICC = 0.99, SEE = 1.0%Fat, p < .001). Both ANT Day1 and POST Day2 were considered equal to POST Day1 , suggesting %Fat can be consistently measured from a single digital image using a smartphone-based application in healthy young and middle-aged adults.
sport sciences,hospitality, leisure, sport & tourism,education & educational research
What problem does this paper attempt to address?