Abstract:Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of six upgraded empirical force fields were compared and evaluated with short peptides, intrinsically disordered proteins, and folded proteins using trajectories of 1, 1.5, 5, or 10 μs (five replicates of 200 ns, 300 ns, 1 μs, or 2 μs) for each system. Previous studies have shown that different force fields, water models, simulation methods, and parameters can affect simulation outcomes. Here, the MD simulations were done in an explicit solvent with RS-peptide, HEWL19, HIV-rev, β amyloid (Aβ)-40, Aβ-42, phosphodiesterase-γ, CspTm, and ubiquitin using ff99IDPs, ff14IDPs, ff14IDPSFF, ff03w, CHARMM36m, and CHARMM22* force fields. The IDP ensembles generated by six all-atom empirical force fields were compared against NMR data. Despite using identical starting structures and simulation parameters, ensembles obtained with different force fields exhibit significant differences in NMR RMDs, secondary structure contents, and global properties such as the radius of gyration. The intrinsically disordered protein (IDP)-specific force fields could substantially reproduce the experimental observables in force field comparison: they have the lowest error in chemical shifts and J-couplings for short peptides/proteins, reasonably well for large IDPs and reasonably well with the radius of gyration. A high population of disorderness was observed in the IDP-specific force field for the IDP ensemble with a fraction of β sheets for β-amyloids. CHARMM22* performs better for many observables; however, it still has a preference toward the helicity for short peptides. The results of β-amyloid 42 starting from two different initial structures (Aβ421Z0Q and Aβ42model) were also compared with DSSP and NMR data. The results obtained with IDP-specific force fields within 2 μs simulation time are similar, even though starting from different structures. The current force fields perform equally well for folded proteins. The results of currently developed or modified force fields for IDPs are capable of enlightening the overall performance of the force field for disordered as well as folded proteins, thereby contributing to force field development.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00762?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00762</a>.Predicted measurement comparison (Table S1); secondary chemical shift conversion (Figure S1); time evolution of the cumulative Rg and the end-to-end distance (Figure S2); comparison of secondary chemical shifts between MD simulations and NMR experiments (Figure S3); cluster analyses (Figure S4); calculated NMR observables in simulations of Ab40 starting from the PDB structure and the extended structure (Figure S5); secondary structure propensity analysis of the trajectories (Figure S6); RMSD analyses of all of the trajectories under the tested force fields (Figure S7) (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00762/suppl_file/ci0c00762_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

Polarizable Force Field of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins with CMAP and Reweighting Optimization

Parametrizing A Polarizable Force Field from Ab Initio Data. I. the Fluctuating Point Charge Model

Recent Development of Atomistic Force Fields and Simulations of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Development of an Effective Polarizable Bond Method for Biomolecular Simulation.

Recent Advances In Atomic Molecular Dynamics Simulation Of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Comparison and Evaluation of Force Fields for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Environment-Specific Force Field for Intrinsically Disordered and Ordered Proteins

System-Specific Parameter Optimization for Nonpolarizable and Polarizable Force Fields

Precise Generation of Conformational Ensembles for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins via Fine-tuned Diffusion Models

Benchmarking polarizable and non-polarizable force fields for Ca2+-peptides against a comprehensive QM dataset

Drude2019IDPC polarizable force field reveals structure-function relationship of insulin

Smoothing molecular interactions: The “kinetic buffer” effect of intrinsically disordered proteins

Fine structures of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Electronic Polarization Stabilizes Tertiary Structure Prediction of HP-36.

Constant-pH Simulations with the Polarizable Atomic Multipole AMOEBA Force Field

Ligand clouds around protein clouds: a scenario of ligand binding with intrinsically disordered proteins.

Developing a molecular dynamics force field for both folded and disordered protein states

System-specific parameter optimization for non-polarizable and polarizable force fields

Optimizing Force Fields with Experimental Data Using Ensemble Reweighting and Potential Contrasting

Configurational Entropy of Folded Proteins and its Importance for Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

Effective Inclusion of Electronic Polarization Improves the Description of Electrostatic Interactions: The prosECCo75 Biomolecular Force Field