Combining tumor response and personalized risk assessment: Potential for adaptation of concurrent chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era

Wei-Jie Luo,Wen-Qing Zou,Shao-Bo Liang,Lei Chen,Guan-Qun Zhou,Hao Peng,Wen-Fei Li,Xu Liu,Ying Sun,Ai-Hua Lin,Jun Ma,Yan-Ping Mao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.10.005
IF: 6.901
2021-02-01
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Background and purpose</h3><p>In the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era, the role of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) after induction chemotherapy (IC) in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC) is undetermined, while concerns exist about CCRT-associated excessive toxicity. We aimed to combine tumor response and risk assessment to guide decisions about concurrent chemotherapy.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Materials and methods</h3><p>From April 2009 to December 2015, 744 LANPC patients treated with CCRT/IMRT after IC were included. Matching techniques were performed for treatment effect evaluation. Tumor response to IC was used for patient stratification. A nomogram was built based on multivariable Cox regression analysis to predict overall survival (OS).</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>After IC, 508 patients (68.3%) achieved favorable tumor response (complete or partial response), among whom IC + CCRT achieved significantly superior 5-year disease-free survival and OS than IC + IMRT (82.2% vs. 72.5%, <em>P</em>=0.025; 89.2% vs. 79.9%, <em>P</em>=0.025). However, no significant difference was found in patients with unfavorable response (both <em>P</em>&gt;0.05). For favorable responders, a nomogram was built integrating age, smoking, T category, N category, pretreatment Epstein-Barr virus DNA and treatment modality. The concordance index was 0.713 and calibration was good. The nomogram determined three risk groups with distinct OS. High-risk patients benefited from CCRT after IC regarding disease-free survival, OS and distant metastasis-free survival, whereas low- and intermediate-risk patients did not.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3><p>For LANPC patients with unfavorable response to IC, subsequent CCRT seems inadequate, rendering intensification necessary. For favorable responders with low risk, IC + IMRT represents a reasonable de-intensification approach, although confirmation by prospective data is needed.</p>
oncology,radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?