Abstract:Introduction Fluid resuscitation is a critical aspect of the sepsis protocol with the usual initial dose being 30 mL per kilogram. Although this dose is well accepted in patients with normal cardiac function, there is some significant variation in clinical practice concerning the optimal fluid resuscitation in septic patients with underlying congestive heart failure (CHF). Many different approaches have been tried to best treat these patients by using lesser volumes of fluid. The purpose of this retrospective study is to attempt to better define optimal fluid resuscitation in congestive heart failure patients and whether standard fluid resuscitation exacerbates CHF in these cases. Methods This was a retrospective study involving patients admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) during the time period of September of 2016 through March of 2019 with a primary diagnosis of sepsis and pre-existing CHF. Data collected from the data warehouse and patient charts included demographics, total amount of fluid received in the ED and outcome data. Evidence of fluid overload (chest X-ray [CXR] evidence, rising B-type natriuretic peptide [BNP], or use of diuretics), was evaluated with respect to in-hospital mortality, white blood cell (WBC) count and comorbidities (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], hypertension and coronary artery disease). Results There were 422 patients included in the cohort. Of the 422, 113 (26.8%) patients showed evidence of fluid overload on CXR during hospital stay and received diuretics and therefore considered in the CHF exacerbation group. The patients that experienced CHF exacerbation were significantly older (mean ± SD, 70.9 ± 11.8 years versus 67.4 ± 15.1 years, p=0.014). Patients with exacerbation also received more fluid (median and interquartile range, 3.0, 2:5.5 L versus 2.0, 1:4.3 L, p=0.017). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for fluid to predict exacerbation resulted in an area under the curve of 0.59 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.52 to 0.65, p=0.012. The Youden Index was used to determine an optimal cutoff value of 2.6 L. The percentage of patients in the exacerbation group above the threshold was significantly higher (57.3%) than those without exacerbation (43.3%), p=0.019. Following multivariate analysis, age greater than 60 (odds ratio [OR]: 2.5; CI: 1.4-4.6, p=0.003) and fluid cutoff of 2.6 L (OR: 1.9; CI: 1.2-3.1, p=0.007) were both found to be independent predictors of CHF exacerbation. There was no significant difference in mortality based on the total fluid received in the ED. Conclusion The findings of this study showed that septic patients with pre-existing CHF who received more than 2.6 L of fluid in the ED were 90% more likely to develop symptoms of CHF exacerbation with no evidence of lowering mortality compared to the group that received less than 2.6 L. Our data supports the practice of limiting total fluid resuscitation in CHF to 2.6 L and reconfirms the idea that fluid resuscitation for patients with CHF needs to be individualized.

Optimal fluid resuscitation targets in septic patients with acutely decompensated heart failure

Albumin Versus Other Fluids For Fluid Resuscitation In Patients With Sepsis: A Meta-Analysis

What Should We Focus on Sepsis Fluid Resuscitation? – a Research Based on Scientometrics and Visual Analysis

Optimizing Fluid Resuscitation and Preventing Fluid Overload in Patients with Septic Shock

Fluid resuscitation in patients with cirrhosis and sepsis: A multidisciplinary perspective

Effect of Fluid Resuscitation on Adhesion Molecule and Hemodynamics in Patients with Severe Sepsis

When to stop septic shock resuscitation: clues from a dynamic perfusion monitoring

An Evaluation of the Use of Aggressive Fluid Resuscitation in the Early Treatment of Sepsis Patients

Fluids and Early Vasopressors in the Management of Septic Shock: Do We Have the Right Answers Yet?

Fluid resuscitation and volume therapy for septic shock

Progress in Fluid Resuscitation of Septic Shock

Assessment of outcomes in patients with heart failure and end-stage kidney disease following fluid resuscitation for sepsis and septic shock

Individualized Fluid Administration for Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis with an Interpretable Dynamic Treatment Regimen Model

[The Application Progress of Fluid De-Escalation Therapy in Abdominal Infection-Induced Septic Shock].

Evaluation and Predictors of Fluid Resuscitation in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock

Fluid management improves the prognosis of septic shock complicated by acute lung injury

The Effect of Fluid Resuscitation Timing in Early Sepsis Resuscitation

Fluid Resuscitation Dilemma in End-stage Renal Disease Patients Presenting with Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Subclinical cardiac dysfunction may impact on fluid and vasopressor administration during early resuscitation of septic shock

Fluid Resuscitation and Sepsis Management in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease or End-Stage Renal Disease: Scoping Review

The effect of conservative fluid management on Toll-like receptor 4 signal pathway of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and cardiac function in patients with septic shock