Some Insights into the Sierpiński Triangle Paradox

Miguel-Ángel Martínez-Cruz,Julián Patiño-Ortiz,Miguel Patiño-Ortiz,Alexander S. S. Balankin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8110655
IF: 3.577
2024-11-12
Fractal and Fractional
Abstract:We realize that a Sierpiński arrowhead curve (SAC) fills a Sierpiński gasket (SG) in the same manner as a Peano curve fills a square. Namely, in the limit of an infinite number of iterations, the fractal SAC remains self-avoiding, such that SAC⊂SG. Therefore, SAC differs from SG in the same sense as the self-avoiding Peano curve PC⊂0,12 differs from the square. In particular, the SG has three-line segments constituting a regular triangle as its border, whereas the border of SAC has the structure of a totally disconnected fat Cantor set. Thus, in contrast to the SG, which has loops at all scales, the SAC is loopless. Consequently, although both patterns have the same similarity dimension D=ln⁡3/ln⁡2, their connectivity dimensions are different. Specifically, the connectivity dimension of the self-avoiding SAC is equal to its topological dimension dlSAC=d=1, whereas the connectivity dimension of the SG is equal to its similarity dimension, that is, dlSG=D. Therefore, the dynamic properties of SG and SAC are also different. Some other noteworthy features of the Sierpiński triangle are also highlighted.
mathematics, interdisciplinary applications
What problem does this paper attempt to address?