A novel chlorin derivative Shengtaibufen (STBF) mediated photodynamic therapy combined with iodophor for the treatment of chronic superficial leg wounds infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A retrospective clinical study
Jianhua Huang,Qing Fan,Lei Shi,Jie Shen,Hongwei Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2024.104300
Abstract:Objective: Chronic wounds are costly and difficult to treat, resulting in morbidity and even mortality in some cases due to a high methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) burden contributing to chronicity. We aimed to observe the antimicrobial activity and healing-promoting effect of a novel photosensitizer Shengtaibufen (STBF)-mediated antibacterial photodynamic therapy (PDT) on MRSA-infected chronic leg ulcers. Patients and methods: This was a retrospective, comparative, single-center clinical study. A total of 32 patients with chronic lower limb wounds infected with MRSA from January 2022 to December 2023 were finally included in this study by searching the electronic medical records of the dermatology department of Huadong Hospital, including a group of red light combined with iodophor (control+iodophor, n=16, receiving red light once a week for 8 weeks and routine dressing change with iodophor once a day) and a group of STBF-mediated PDT (STBF-PDT) combined with iodophor (STBF-PDT+iodophor, n=16, receiving STBF-PDT and routine dressing change with iodophor once a day). STBF-PDT was performed once a week (1 mg/ml STBF, 1 h incubation, 630 nm red light, 80 J/cm2) for 8 weeks. The primary endpoints included wound clinical signs, wound size, wound-related pain, re-epithelialization score, MRSA load and wound-related quality of life (wound-QoL). Any adverse events were also recorded. Results: We found that STBF-PDT+iodophor could effectively alleviate clinical infection symptoms, accelerate wound closure, reduce average biological burden and improve wound-QoL without severe adverse events in comparison to the control+iodophor group. The STBF-PDT+iodophor group obtained a mean percentage reduction of 65.22% in wound size (from 18.96±11.18 cm2 to 6.59±7.94 cm2) and excellent re-epithelialization scores, as compared with a decrease of 30.17% (from 19.23±9.80 cm2 to 13.43±9.32 cm2) for the control+iodophor group. Significant differences in wound area were observed at week 6 (p=0.028*) and week 8 (p=0.002**). The bacterial load decreased by 99.86% (from 6.45 × 107±2.69 × 107 to 8.94 × 104±1.92 × 105 CFU/cm2, p<0.0001) in the STBF-PDT+iodophor group and 1.82% (from 6.61 × 107±2.13 × 107 to 6.49 × 107±2.01 × 107 CFU/cm2, p=0.029) in the control+iodophor group. The wound-QoL in STBF-PDT+iodophor group had a 51.62% decrease in overall score (from 29.65±9.33 at the initial to 14.34±5.17 at week 8, p<0.0001) compared to those receiving red light and routine wound care (from 30.73±17.16 to 29.32±15.89 at week 8, p=0.003). Moreover, patients undergoing STBF-PDT+iodophor exhibited great improvements in all domains of wound-QoL (physical, psychological and everyday-life), whereas the control+iodophor group ameliorated in only one field (everyday-life). Conclusion: Our data confirmed that a novel photosensitizer, STBF-mediated PDT, when combined with iodophor, served as a potential modality for MRSA infection and a possible therapy for other drug-resistant microorganisms, and as a promising alternative for chronic cutaneous infectious diseases.