Abstract:Background: Intensive longitudinal data (ILD) collection methods have gained popularity in social and behavioral research as a tool to better understand behavior and experiences over time with reduced recall bias. Engaging participants in these studies over multiple months and ensuring high data quality are crucial but challenging due to the potential burden of repeated measurements. It is suspected that participants may engage in inattentive responding (IR) behavior to combat burden, but the processes underlying this behavior are unclear as previous studies have focused on the barriers to compliance rather than the barriers to providing high-quality data. Objective: This study aims to broaden researchers' knowledge about IR during ILD studies using qualitative analysis and uncover the underlying IR processes to aid future hypothesis generation. Methods: We explored the process of IR by conducting semistructured qualitative exit interviews with 31 young adult participants (aged 18-29 years) who completed a 12-month ILD health behavior study with daily evening smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) surveys and 4-day waves of hourly EMA surveys. The interviews assessed participants' motivations, the impact of time-varying contexts, changes in motivation and response patterns over time, and perceptions of attention check questions (ACQs) to understand participants' response patterns and potential factors leading to IR. Results: Thematic analysis revealed 5 overarching themes on factors that influence participant engagement: (1) friends and family also had to tolerate the frequent surveys, (2) participants tried to respond to surveys quickly, (3) the repetitive nature of surveys led to neutral responses, (4) ACQs within the surveys helped to combat overly consistent response patterns, and (5) different motivations for answering the surveys may have led to different levels of data quality. Conclusions: This study aimed to examine participants' perceptions of the quality of data provided in an ILD study to contribute to the field's understanding of engagement. These findings provide insights into the complex process of IR and participant engagement in ILD studies with EMA. The study identified 5 factors influencing IR that could guide future research to improve EMA survey design. The identified themes offer practical implications for researchers and study designers, including the importance of considering social context, the consideration of dynamic motivations, and the potential benefit of including ACQs as a technique to reduce IR and leveraging the intrinsic motivators of participants. By incorporating these insights, researchers might maximize the scientific value of their multimonth ILD studies through better data collection protocols. International registered report identifier (irrid): RR2-10.2196/36666.

Assessing and accounting for measurement in intensive longitudinal studies: current practices, considerations, and avenues for improvement

Burden and Inattentive Responding in a 12-Month Intensive Longitudinal Study: Interview Study Among Young Adults

The development of intrinsic capacity measures for longitudinal research: The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam

Compliance and response consistency in a lengthy intensive longitudinal data protocol.

Methods to Assess Social Comparison Processes Within Persons in Daily Life: A Scoping Review

Two-method planned missing designs for longitudinal research

How Well Can We Measure Chronic Pain Impact in Existing Longitudinal Cohort Studies? Lessons Learned

The Effects of Questionnaire Length on the Relative Impact of Response Styles in Ambulatory Assessment

Investigating dynamics in attentive and inattentive responding together with their contextual correlates using a novel mixture IRT model for intensive longitudinal data

Nurturing Longitudinal Samples 2.0

DIetary ASSessment (DIASS) Study: Design of an Evaluation Study to Assess Validity, Usability and Perceived Burden of an Innovative Dietary Assessment Methodology

Testing the applicability of idionomic statistics in longitudinal studies: The example of 'doing what matters'

Measuring end-of-life care and outcomes in residential care/assisted living and nursing homes

Efficient Study Design with Multiple Measurement Instruments

Modeling repeated self-reported outcome data: A continuous-time longitudinal Item Response Theory model

When Respondents Don't Care Anymore: Identifying the Onset of Careless Responding

Structuring, Sequencing, Staging, Selecting: the 4S method for the longitudinal analysis of multidimensional measurement scales in chronic diseases

Multiple imputation of missing data in multilevel ecological momentary assessments: an example using smoking cessation study data

Repeated Measures Designs and Analysis of Longitudinal Data: If at First You Do Not Succeed—Try, Try Again

The ILHBN: challenges, opportunities, and solutions from harmonizing data under heterogeneous study designs, target populations, and measurement protocols

Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire: Does the subjectivity of the response perspective threaten the contextual validity of inferences?